Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PowerShell Plus VS PCem

Compare PowerShell Plus VS PCem and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

PowerShell Plus logo PowerShell Plus

Learn how to learn and master PowerShell fast with an interactive learning center, a powerful IDE, pre-loaded scripts, and a PowerShell Editor… all for free.

PCem logo PCem

PCem emulates an IBM 5150 PC, several models of clones and successors, along with various graphics...
  • PowerShell Plus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-02
  • PCem Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06

PowerShell Plus features and specs

  • Comprehensive Script Editor
    PowerShell Plus offers an advanced script editor with IntelliSense, syntax coloring, and code completion, making script development faster and more efficient.
  • Integrated Debugger
    It includes a powerful debugger that allows step-by-step execution, variable viewing, and real-time correction of errors in scripts, enhancing script reliability.
  • Preloaded Learning Resources
    The tool comes with a library of preloaded samples, learning information, and quick guides to help users, especially beginners, learn and implement PowerShell effectively.
  • Intuitive User Interface
    PowerShell Plus provides a user-friendly interface that is easy to navigate, reducing the learning curve for new users and improving productivity for seasoned professionals.
  • Real-time Analytics
    With real-time performance monitoring and resource reporting, users can gain insights into script performance and optimize them accordingly.

Possible disadvantages of PowerShell Plus

  • Limited Updates
    As a free tool, PowerShell Plus may not receive frequent updates or new features compared to paid alternatives, which can affect long-term usability.
  • Platform Dependency
    This tool is Windows-based, limiting its use on non-Windows operating systems unless using virtualization or dual-boot solutions.
  • Resource Intensive
    PowerShell Plus can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down system performance on less powerful hardware configurations.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite included resources, beginners may still find the learning curve steep due to the complexity of PowerShell scripting, especially for advanced functions.
  • Community Support
    As a niche tool, it may have a smaller community support base compared to more widely used PowerShell IDEs, impacting the availability of communal help and resources.

PCem features and specs

  • High Compatibility
    PCem is known for its high compatibility with a wide range of older PC systems, allowing users to emulate various hardware configurations from the '80s and '90s.
  • Wide OS Support
    PCem supports a variety of operating systems, allowing users to run DOS, Windows 95, 98, and many other legacy systems.
  • Authentic Experience
    By emulating the hardware at a low level, PCem provides an experience that is very close to using an actual vintage PC.
  • Customization
    Users have extensive control over the configuration of the emulated machine, including CPU type, amount of RAM, and various peripherals.

Possible disadvantages of PCem

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up PCem can be complex, especially for users not familiar with configuring legacy PC hardware and software.
  • Resource Intensive
    PCem can be resource-intensive compared to other emulators, requiring a relatively powerful modern PC to run smoothly.
  • Limited Graphics Support
    While it supports many early graphics cards, PCem lacks support for more advanced graphics emulation beyond older Voodoo models.
  • Requires BIOS
    PCem requires the user to provide their own BIOS files for the emulated systems, which can be difficult to legally obtain.

PowerShell Plus videos

No PowerShell Plus videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

PCem videos

Installation and Review of Windows NT 3.1 Build 297 (PCem)

More videos:

  • Review - Emulating Windows 98 (D3D, 3Dfx) on PCEM running 3DMark'99 Full Speed On A Windows 10 PC
  • Demo - Blood II PC Gamer Demo (PCEM Test)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PowerShell Plus and PCem)
Cryptocurrencies
100 100%
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
Blockchain
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PowerShell Plus and PCem. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PCem seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 34 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PowerShell Plus mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PowerShell Plus yet. Tracking of PowerShell Plus recommendations started around Mar 2021.

PCem mentions (34)

  • Popularity of DOS/4GW made Win95 game compat easier, but with higher stakes
    Absolutely check out PCem for a closer to hardware emulation than dosbox, https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Anyone get Sid Meier's SimGolf Working?
    One option is to try PCEm https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/ which is a emulator for old computers that runs on Windows and Linux, I actually learned about it via this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9HP9W88Wew of a guy playing Sim Golf on his Windows PC using PCEm, this should be similar on Linux but I'm not sure if the SteamDeck will have enough power but maybe worth a try. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is there anyway to port old abandonware Windows 95/98 game to Apple Silicon?
    For hardcore mode, compile PCEm - I think brew has most of the dependencies available ... https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/ - have fun! Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is VirtualBox still really bad with Windows 9x?
    You use 86box or PCem which are not virtualizers but hardware emulators so you will need a really fast CPU (especially in single thread). The advantage is that Windows 98 will be running on period appropriate hardware, since all of it is being emulated real-time. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Intel Explores Transition to 64-Bit-Only X86S Architecture
    QEMU [0] emulates many systems, including the 32-bit Intel architecture. For retro gaming specifically I can recommend PCem [1], which also emulates a wide range of sound and graphics cards, from IBM MDA to 3dfx Voodoo 2. [0] https://www.qemu.org/ [1] https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PowerShell Plus and PCem, you can also consider the following products

GNU Bourne Again SHell - Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

NASM - The Netwide Assembler, NASM, is an 80x86 and x86-64 assembler designed for portability and...

fish shell - The friendly interactive shell.

86Box - 86Box is a hypervisor and IBM PC system emulator that specializes in running old operating systems...

PowerShell Studio - PowerShell Studio is the easiest GUI designer and script generator available.

flat assembler - A fast and efficient self-assembling x86 assembler for DOS, Windows and Linux.