Potlab Icons VS Unused CSS finder

Animated SVG icons for web projects

Crawl your website and find unused CSS

Wide Variety
Potlab Icons offers a wide range of icon styles and themes, catering to different design needs.
High Quality
The icons are designed with high attention to detail and precision, ensuring a polished and professional look.
Customizable
Icons from Potlab can be easily customized in terms of color and size, making them adaptable to various projects.
Consistent Style
The icon sets are designed to maintain a consistent style throughout, which is essential for cohesive branding.

Cost
Depending on the package or license, Potlab Icons might be more expensive compared to other icon resources.
Limited Free Options
There are only a limited number of free icons available, which might not be sufficient for some users.
Style Constraints
The specificity in design style may not suit every project, especially those looking for very niche or unique aesthetics.
Licensing Restrictions
Some licenses might impose restrictions on the use of the icons in commercial projects, which could be a limitation for some users.

Efficiency
Identifies unused CSS, resulting in cleaner and more efficient code. This can lead to improved page load times and reduced bandwidth usage.
Ease of Use
Provides a straightforward interface that allows users to quickly scan their websites and find unnecessary CSS without needing extensive technical knowledge.
Cost Savings
By eliminating unused CSS, it reduces the amount of data that needs to be transmitted and stored, potentially saving on hosting and bandwidth costs.
Improved Maintenance
With a reduction in CSS file size, future maintenance becomes easier and more manageable, making it simpler to update or refactor code.

False Positives
May incorrectly identify CSS as unused if the tool does not recognize dynamic changes or conditional loading, which can lead to accidental removal of necessary styles.
Dependency on External Tool
Relying on an external tool could present privacy and security concerns, especially when sharing potentially sensitive code and styling information.
Manual Verification
Requires manual verification of results to ensure important styles are not removed, which can be time-consuming and somewhat negate the tool's time savings.
Incompatibility with Complex Frameworks
Might not effectively handle complex CSS frameworks or preprocessors, where styles are used indirectly or dynamically through Javascript or server-side frameworks.