Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Portworx VS rkt

Compare Portworx VS rkt and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Portworx logo Portworx

Portworx provides enterprise-class data services, purpose-built for containers.

rkt logo rkt

App Container runtime
  • Portworx Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30
  • rkt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08

Portworx videos

+ Add

Portworx Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Persistent Storage with Portworx on Kubernetes
  • Review - Building Cloud Native Infrastructure with Portworx with Goutham Rao

rkt videos

+ Add

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

More videos:

  • Review - 2018 Niner RKT 9 RDO - First Look and Build Kit Overview
  • Review - Best Stock Picks Today | RKT Stock 9-2-20

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Portworx and rkt)

Portworx

rkt

Developer Tools
25 25%
Developer Tools
75% 75
Cloud Computing
12 12%
Cloud Computing
88% 88
Cloud Storage
0 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Portworx and rkt. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Portworx and rkt

Portworx Reviews

We have no reviews of Portworx yet.
Be the first one to post

rkt Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:
Source: containerjournal.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Portworx seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Portworx mentions (1)

  • Network Storage on On-Prem Barebones Machine
    I would investigate https://openebs.io/ https://portworx.com/ https://longhorn.io/ if you are forced to you can mount ISCSI on the kublet and feed it to one of those solutions. Keep in mind most of the big guys buy some sort of managed solution that you can point a CSI like trident https://netapp-trident.readthedocs.io. Source: almost 2 years ago

rkt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of rkt yet. Tracking of rkt recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Portworx and rkt, you can also consider the following products

Tutum - Run, monitor, and scale Docker containers. Simply.

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Loading...