POEditor VS Pugjs

POEditor Reviews

1. Ana Tudor    

   over 2 years ago
   An amazing tool for translation management

   I enjoy using this platform. It has really made my work as a translator easier. I like that you can see the history of the translations and also the QA check feature is really useful.

2. lbennet675    

   Localization manager | over 2 years ago
   Great localization software

   Easy to use UI, a lot of useful features and a reliable support team!

   🏁 Competitors: Crowdin

   👍 Pros:    Affordable price|Great customer support|Fast support|Excellent features

   👎 Cons:    Nothing, so far
3. Sonia Krugers    

   almost 4 years ago
   Great localizing experience

   It made my life much easier and helped me get my project done in no time. The features are really straightforward to use and their support team are always ready to give a hand in case you get stuck. I highly recommend it to everyone who needs professional help to manage a localization project effectively!

Pugjs Reviews

POEditor mentions (7)

• A minimal dependency-free translation system for Next.js

  For the purpose of this blog and demo I decided to use POEditor to host my translations. They have a generous free tier which is more than enough for this demo. I created a project, added 2 languages (NL and EN) and added a few translations to it. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• Crowdsourcing localization

  For this, I tried to use Angular's build in functionality (@angular/localize) with POEditor. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Recommended way to show content from API for multi language apps?

  Check out POEditor, might be what you are looking for. Source: about 2 years ago

• [Spanish>English] Was sent this meme by a friend and am having a hard time translating it to English. Anything helps, thank you!!

  There's a bunch of others you can find if you google something like "crowdsource app translation" (ex1 ex2 ex3). I hope this helps, and I'll go add these to our wiki, since I also had to hunt them down across the subreddit. Source: over 2 years ago

• I built futurecoder: a 100% free and interactive course for complete beginners

  It would be great if the translation is on a service like https://poeditor.com/, so it can be easier to maintain and recruit other faculty members that aren't so savvy. Source: over 2 years ago

Pugjs mentions (27)

• Writing HTML by Hand

  I hate writing HTML. Yes, there's IDE support for inserting s but it's just annoying. Same for lists of classes or attributes etc. For everyone else feeling like me: Try pug (formerly jade) or rather it's CLI variant pug-cli. You can reuse stuff and even have JS in it to iterate through stuff or give it parameters while still feeling pretty vanilla. https://pugjs.org/api/getting-started.html. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Why doesn't this load() command work?

  Sounds like Time Out is a little bit limited in its rendering capabilities, but I think you could still consider using something like PugJS. Basically, you would write the master file, and any includes, then use the pug CLI to compile it down into one .html file. Source: 10 months ago

• How popular are libraries in each technology

  Templating engines are tools that enable developers to create HTML templates that can be dynamically generated and rendered by web applications. There are many templating engines available, but the most popular by far is Pug. Pug is a templating engine that is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It has over 21.3k stars on Github. Airbnb and Node.js use Pug templating engine. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

• I hate UI

  Are you proficient in the new UITK? If so, a Twitter Bootstrap, maybe a Pug abstraction would be VERY appreciated if sold on the asset store. Source: about 1 year ago

• Supercharge Your HTML&CSS Workflow With Pug and TailwindCSS

  A much better approach is to use HTML templating languages, such as Pug and CSS frameworks, such as Tailwind CSS, to generate your HTML and CSS code on the fly. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago