Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

PocketBlocks VS Editor.js

Compare PocketBlocks VS Editor.js and see what are their differences

Momen
Build powerful web apps, and create your custom AI apps, no code needed! featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

PocketBlocks logo PocketBlocks

In PocketBlocks, all you need to do is drag and drop pre-built or self-customized components onto the What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get (WYSIWYG) canvas to make an app, PocketBlocks helps you build an app quickly and focus on the business logic.

Editor.js logo Editor.js

A block-styled editor with clean JSON output
  • PocketBlocks Branding
    Branding //
    2024-05-21
  • PocketBlocks App Editor
    App Editor //
    2024-05-21

Openblocks + PocketBase = PocketBlocks.

PocketBlocks is an integration between Openblocks and PocketBase.

Traditionally, building an internal app requires complex frontend and backend interactions with hundreds and thousands of lines of code, not to mention work on packaging, integration, and deployment. PocketBlocks significantly reduces the work you need to do to build an app.

In PocketBlocks, all you need to do is drag and drop pre-built or self-customized components onto the What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get (WYSIWYG) canvas, PocketBlocks helps you build an app quickly and focus on business logic.

Why choose PocketBlocks? Open source: Makes your ideas more feasible. High scalability: Allows you to execute JavaScript almost anywhere you would like to customize your business processes and UI components. Clean design: Follows the principles of Ant Design and supports display on screens of different sizes. We have a number of UI components, based on which you can freely build a dashboard, admin panel, and content management system (CMS).

  • Editor.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

PocketBlocks features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Editor.js features and specs

  • Modular Architecture
    Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
  • Block Style Editor
    The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
  • Clean JSON Output
    Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
  • API Flexibility
    Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
  • Lightweight & Fast
    The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
  • Limited Built-In Tools
    Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
  • Lack of Native Features
    Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

PocketBlocks videos

No PocketBlocks videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Editor.js videos

+ Add

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos:

  • Review - umbraCoffee #079 - Editor.js, tide flows, and Codegarden blues

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PocketBlocks and Editor.js)

PocketBlocks

Editor.js

No Code
100 100%
No Code
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Rich Text Editor
0 0%
Rich Text Editor
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing PocketBlocks and Editor.js.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

PocketBlocks's answer

Open source: Makes your ideas more feasible. High scalability: Allows you to execute JavaScript almost anywhere you would like to customize your business processes and UI components. Clean design: Follows the principles of Ant Design and supports display on screens of different sizes. We have a number of UI components, based on which you can freely build a dashboard, admin panel, and content management system (CMS).

What makes your product unique?

PocketBlocks's answer

An entire low-code platform within a single binary.

How would you describe your primary audience?

PocketBlocks's answer

Developer who needs a platform to create internal tools.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

PocketBlocks's answer

Golang, Typescript, SQLite.

User comments

Share your experience with using PocketBlocks and Editor.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare PocketBlocks and Editor.js

PocketBlocks Reviews

We have no reviews of PocketBlocks yet.
Be the first one to post

Editor.js Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.
Source: itsfoss.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PocketBlocks and Editor.js, you can also consider the following products

ToolJet - Open-source alternative for Retool

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

Appsmith - Appsmith is an open source web framework for building internal tools, admin panels, dashboards, and workflows.

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Budibase - What Wordpress is to websites, Budibase is to web apps. Budibase is a free and open source web app builder for creating, launching and growing web applications. Budibase eliminates repetition and dramatically reduces development time. Check it out.

TinyMCE - TinyMCE is a content editor that functions as a plug-in for Wordpress websites.

Loading...