PocketBase.io VS LocalStack

Compare PocketBase.io VS LocalStack and see what are their differences

ASocks

Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

PocketBase.io

Open Source backend with realtime database, authentication, file storage and admin dashboard, all compiled in 1 portable executable.

LocalStack

LocalStack collects & analyzes the social media activity on every business in America.

Landing page //
2022-07-07

PocketBase is a Go backend (framework and app) that includes:

embedded database with realtime subscriptions
backed-in files and users management
convenient Admin dashboard UI
simple REST-ish API

And all of this compiles in a single portable executable.

Landing page //
2020-07-22

PocketBase.io

Website: pocketbase.io
$ Details: free
Platforms: Web Linux Mac OSX Windows
Release Date: 2022 July

Edit details

LocalStack

Website: localstack.com
$ Details: -
Platforms: -
Release Date: -

Edit details

PocketBase.io features and specs

Realtime database
Authentication via email/password
Authentuication via OAuth2
Files management
Admin dashboard

LocalStack features and specs

Cost Efficiency
LocalStack allows developers to emulate AWS services on their local machine, reducing the need for constantly deploying to AWS during the development phase, hence saving on cloud service costs.
Development Speed
By using LocalStack, developers can quickly test and iterate their cloud-based applications locally without the delay of deploying to a remote AWS environment, speeding up the development process.
Network Independence
LocalStack can run entirely offline, meaning that developers are not dependent on internet connectivity while developing and testing AWS cloud services, which is advantageous in network-restricted environments.
Isolation
Running services locally provides an isolated environment for testing, which minimizes the risk of affecting live resources or incurring costs due to accidental cloud service usage.
Integration
LocalStack integrates well with various CI/CD systems, allowing for automated testing and development workflows with simulated AWS services.

Possible disadvantages of LocalStack

Service Limitations
LocalStack does not support all AWS services; some of the less commonly used services may not be available or fully supported, limiting its applicability in certain scenarios.
Performance Discrepancies
The performance characteristics of LocalStack services may differ from their AWS counterparts, which can lead to discrepancies in performance testing and benchmarking.
Setup Complexity
Setting up and maintaining LocalStack can be complex due to dependencies, necessary configurations, and the need for continuous updates to stay in sync with AWS changes.
Feature Parity
As AWS adds new features and updates existing services, it may take time for LocalStack to implement these changes, potentially lagging behind AWS in terms of features.
Scaling
LocalStack is primarily for development and testing on a small scale. It may not replicate the scalability of AWS services, which could limit the feasibility of load testing.

PocketBase.io videos

No PocketBase.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

LocalStack videos

+ Add

AWS LocalStack SQS - Installing AWS LocalStack

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PocketBase.io and LocalStack)

LocalStack

Developer Tools

84 84%

Developer Tools

16% 16

Realtime Backend / API

100 100%

Realtime Backend / API

0% 0

Weather Apps

0 0%

Weather Apps

100% 100

Web Frameworks

100 100%

Web Frameworks

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using PocketBase.io and LocalStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PocketBase.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 93 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PocketBase.io mentions (93)

PocketBase + React Native
I have a bit of an obsession with finding the fastest way to launch apps. My goal is to be able to create fully functional MVP's and proofs of concept in less than a day. That means being able to spin up a backend and then implement a frontend as efficiently as possible. For the backend, PocketBase has been my favorite lately. On the frontend I am still trying to find a winner. I like Quasar (VueJS + Capacitor)... - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
Manifest: A 1-file micro-back end
Are you aware of pocketbase? https://pocketbase.io/ I think it could work for your usecase, even though its generally focused on being a backend. I have had a very nice experience. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Goravel: A Go framework inspired by Laravel
For quick prototyping I really like https://pocketbase.io/ I am actually using this for a production site that gets 1 million requests per day. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
For the Love of God...just use Supabase
Pocketbase is a lightweight, open-source backend solution that combines a real-time database with file storage and authentication services. Its key benefits include simplicity and portability, as it can be run locally or in the cloud without much overhead. Designed to be user-friendly for both small projects and rapid prototyping, Pocketbase makes it easy for developers to quickly deploy applications with built-in... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Supercharge the One Person Framework with SQLite
Reading the title makes me think that I’m about to see an article about Pocketbase [0]. With the big refactoring in RC (v0.23.0), extending Pocketbase is going to be much better. [0] https://pocketbase.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago