Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Plastic SCM VS Gitea

Compare Plastic SCM VS Gitea and see what are their differences

Plastic SCM logo Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM is a cross-platform commercial distributed version control tool.

Gitea logo Gitea

A painless self-hosted Git service
  • Plastic SCM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-05
  • Gitea Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-20

Plastic SCM features and specs

  • Scalability
    Plastic SCM is designed to handle large projects with extensive histories and large binary files efficiently, making it suitable for enterprises and large development teams.
  • Branching and Merging
    Offers advanced branching and merging capabilities, including visualization tools that make it easier for developers to manage complex branches and understand changes over time.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, which allows teams using diverse platforms to collaborate seamlessly.
  • GUI Tools
    Provides intuitive and powerful graphical user interfaces, which make it easier for users to interact with the system and manage repositories without deep command-line knowledge.
  • Large File Handling
    Plastic SCM is optimized for handling large binary files, which is often a limitation with other version control systems like Git.
  • Integrations
    Supports integrations with popular tools such as Unity, Jenkins, and JIRA, enabling smoother workflows in development environments.

Possible disadvantages of Plastic SCM

  • Learning Curve
    Users who are accustomed to Git or other systems may find it challenging to adapt to Plastic SCM’s unique interfaces and workflows.
  • Cost
    Plastic SCM is a commercial product, and its licensing fees can be prohibitive for small teams or hobby projects when compared to free options like Git.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to more widespread systems like Git, the community around Plastic SCM is smaller, which can lead to fewer third-party resources, plugins, and community-driven support options.
  • Non-Standard Command Line Interface
    The command line interface is not standard, which might be less convenient for developers used to standard Git commands and operations.
  • Server Requirements
    Requires centralized server setups, which can introduce additional infrastructure complexity and costs for smaller teams.

Gitea features and specs

  • Open Source
    Gitea is open source, allowing users to freely inspect, modify, and contribute to its codebase. This fosters transparency and community-driven development.
  • Lightweight
    Gitea is designed to be lightweight, making it easy to run even on resource-limited systems. This makes it ideal for self-hosted environments.
  • Easy Installation
    Gitea offers a straightforward installation process, making it simple for users to get up and running quickly without complex setup procedures.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Despite being lightweight, Gitea provides a robust feature set, including issue tracking, pull requests, and continuous integration support, which covers the majority of use cases.
  • Active Community
    Gitea has an active and growing community, which contributes to its development and provides support through forums, documentation, and tutorials.
  • Customizable
    Gitea allows for extensive customization through configuration options and extensions, enabling users to tailor the platform to their specific needs.
  • Self-Hosting
    Users have full control over their repositories and data when self-hosting Gitea, which enhances privacy and security compared to third-party hosting services.

Possible disadvantages of Gitea

  • Limited Enterprise Features
    Gitea may lack some advanced enterprise features found in other platforms like GitHub Enterprise or GitLab, such as advanced permissions management and extensive integrations.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to larger platforms like GitHub, Gitea has a smaller ecosystem of plugins and integrations, which may limit certain functionalities.
  • Community Support
    While Gitea has an active community, it lacks the formal, professional support options available from larger commercial services, which might be a drawback for businesses seeking guaranteed support.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may experience a learning curve when transitioning to Gitea, especially if they are accustomed to other platforms with different workflows and interfaces.
  • Scalability Concerns
    For very large projects or organizations, Gitea may face scalability issues, as it is designed to be lightweight and may not handle extremely large loads as well as some competitors.
  • Update Management
    Users are responsible for managing Gitea updates and server maintenance when self-hosting, which requires additional administrative effort compared to cloud-hosted solutions.

Analysis of Gitea

Overall verdict

  • Gitea is generally considered a good option for users seeking a lightweight and self-hosted alternative to more resource-intensive platforms like GitLab or GitHub Enterprise. Its ease of use, open-source nature, and flexibility make it an attractive choice for personal projects or small to medium-sized teams.

Why this product is good

  • Gitea is a lightweight, self-hosted git service that's open-source and easy to set up. It's designed to be accessible and simple while offering essential features for project hosting and collaboration. Gitea supports a wide range of platforms and architectures due to its Go-based implementation, and it has a strong community support. It is particularly valued for its low resource usage and its ability to run on minimal hardware.

Recommended for

    Gitea is recommended for developers and teams who prefer self-hosted solutions and need an efficient, uncomplicated git service. It's suitable for small to medium-sized projects where simplicity, low resource requirements, and ease of deployment are key considerations. It's also a good fit for users who want full control over their source code hosting environment.

Plastic SCM videos

Plastic SCM - The version control for Unity

More videos:

  • Review - What is Plastic SCM - a short intro to the key concepts
  • Review - Get started with Plastic SCM – from zero to merge hero

Gitea videos

GITEA REVIEW ⭐ TUTORIAL 👨 RUN YOUR OWN GIT SERVER 💻 $50 FREEBIE 💰

More videos:

  • Review - Migrate to a Microsoft Github Alternative: Gitea
  • Review - Gitea - Git with a cup of tea - Installation and Configuration

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Plastic SCM and Gitea)
Code Collaboration
13 13%
87% 87
Git
13 13%
87% 87
Version Control
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Plastic SCM and Gitea. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Plastic SCM and Gitea

Plastic SCM Reviews

We have no reviews of Plastic SCM yet.
Be the first one to post

Gitea Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
Gitea is a painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service that includes Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry, and CI/CD. It is similar to GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab. Gitea was forked from Gogs originally and almost all the code has been changed.
Top 7 GitHub Alternatives You Should Know (2024)
Gitea is a lightweight, fast, and reliable DevOps platform providing development teams with essential version control and collaboration features. k
Source: snappify.com
Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option
The Pull Request workflow is so dominant now that it’s considered the default path for code to permanently enter into a repository. You can see a similar features in GitHub’s smaller competition Codeberg, GitLab, BitBucket, and Gitea. These competitors don’t offer other, major code collaboration tools, and their Pull Request-like features aren’t just there to help users come...
Gitea - Alternative to GitLab and GitHub
There are still plenty of things you might want centralized on a server somewhere, but it seems like a lot of the value add of GitHub, GitLab, and now Gitea is in making git repos easier to manage and interact with.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Gitea seems to be a lot more popular than Plastic SCM. While we know about 60 links to Gitea, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Plastic SCM. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Plastic SCM mentions (2)

  • Plastic SCM stuck on Step 1
    I decided to set up Plastic but I can't even get past step 1. I press login or Sign Up but it just opens a window saying "You correctly signed up to plasticscm.com!" I already have an organization set up as well as Dev Ops. I am not sure what to do now. Thanks in advance. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Best way to manage version control?
    I use http://plasticscm.com hosted in their cloud. A few bucks a month for a pretty good VCS capable of handling large files. Source: almost 3 years ago

Gitea mentions (60)

  • Beware Offers of “Help” with Your Projects
    This reminds me of Gogs [0], where the original author refused a lot of good ideas and improvements, eventually leading to a fork [1] that's now a lot more popular and active than the original. [0] https://gogs.io/ [1] https://gitea.io/en-us/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Incident with Issues and Pull Requests
    Yes, we do this using https://gitea.io/en-us/ on a private server. Firewall, backups and a replica running for most projects. Github is only used when it's required by a stakeholder. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Let's Make Sure GitHub Doesn't Become the Only Option
    There's a number of places out there, some of which also support alternatives to Git itself. By no means a complete list and in no particular order: GitLab - https://about.gitlab.com/ Sourcehut - https://sourcehut.org/ Codeberg - https://codeberg.org/ Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/ Debian Salsa - https://salsa.debian.org/public Pagure - https://pagure.io/pagure For self hsoted options, there's these below... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • If you're on DSM 6 and still waiting for an update on the GitLab package, don't bother
    And if you need GitLab (for runner, etc...) then it's not too bad to run in Docker. But if anyone is looking for a somewhat simpler git solution, gitea is pretty great. Source: about 2 years ago
  • OpenBSD Upgrade 7.2 to 7.3
    Check: Configuration and syntax changes and Special packages. The latter includes changes on PostgreSQL, Python and Gitea. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Plastic SCM and Gitea, you can also consider the following products

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.