Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Pixi.js VS JointJS

Compare Pixi.js VS JointJS and see what are their differences

Pixi.js logo Pixi.js

Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

JointJS logo JointJS

Create interactive diagrams in JavaScript easily.
  • Pixi.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-14
  • JointJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-07

Pixi.js features and specs

  • High Performance
    Pixi.js utilizes WebGL to deliver high-performance rendering, which is ideal for building fast and responsive web applications and games.
  • Cross-Platform
    It supports multiple platforms, allowing developers to build applications that work seamlessly across different devices, including desktops, tablets, and smartphones.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Pixi.js has comprehensive and well-documented resources that help developers understand how to use the library effectively, including tutorials and examples.
  • Rich Feature Set
    The library comes with a wide range of features such as textures, sprites, and filters, enabling developers to create visually complex and appealing content.
  • Active Community
    Pixi.js benefits from a large and active community, which means frequent updates, a wealth of plugins, and abundant community support.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source library, Pixi.js is free to use and modify, making it accessible to developers with different levels of expertise and budgets.

Possible disadvantages of Pixi.js

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its extensive documentation, beginners may find Pixi.js challenging to learn and integrate into their projects because of its extensive feature set.
  • WebGL Dependencies
    While WebGL provides high performance, it can also cause compatibility issues on older devices or browsers that do not fully support WebGL.
  • Limited 3D Capabilities
    Pixi.js is primarily a 2D rendering engine, so it may not be suitable for projects that require advanced 3D graphics and interactions.
  • Size
    Compared to simpler libraries, Pixi.js can be relatively large in terms of file size, which could impact the loading times of web applications, especially on slower networks.
  • Complex Debugging
    Debugging issues in Pixi.js can be complex, especially in large applications, as it often involves low-level graphics operations and WebGL debugging tools.

JointJS features and specs

  • Flexible and Extensible
    JointJS is highly modular and allows developers to create custom shapes and interactive elements easily. The flexibility helps in tailoring diagrams specific to application needs.
  • Integrated Ecosystem
    JointJS comes with Rappid, an extended toolkit that adds more functionalities such as UI components, rich plugins, and additional elements to enhance diagramming capabilities.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    JointJS provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and examples that help developers quickly understand and implement their solutions.
  • Wide Range of Diagram Types
    It supports a broad variety of diagrams such as flowcharts, organizational charts, ER diagrams, and more, making it versatile for many use cases.

Possible disadvantages of JointJS

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its flexibility and extensive API, new users might find it challenging to get started, especially if they need to customize their solutions extensively.
  • Licensing Costs with Rappid
    While JointJS is open source, Rappid which offers advanced features and tools, is licensed, potentially resulting in additional costs for businesses.
  • Performance Concerns on Large Diagrams
    Although JointJS is robust, rendering very large or complex diagrams may introduce performance issues, affecting usability for high-demand applications.
  • Limited Community Support
    The community around JointJS is not as extensive as some other open-source projects, which might limit resources such as third-party plugins or user-generated content.

Pixi.js videos

PixiJS Crash Course

JointJS videos

No JointJS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Pixi.js and JointJS)
Javascript UI Libraries
90 90%
10% 10
Flowcharts
0 0%
100% 100
Charting Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Org Charts
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Pixi.js and JointJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Pixi.js and JointJS

Pixi.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Pixi.js yet.
Be the first one to post

JointJS Reviews

20+ JavaScript libraries to draw your own diagrams (2022 edition)
Rappid is the commercial extension of JointJS. It’s a set of JointJS plugins and other components that gives more possibilities and ready to use features when creating a diagramming tool. Here are some of its features:

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pixi.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Pixi.js mentions (5)

  • Release Radar • March 2024 Edition
    If you're into video game dev, then PixiJS is something you need to know about. It's a HTML5 game engine that provides a lightweight 2D library across all devices. This latest update has a new package structure, custom builds, graphics API overhaul, and lots more. You can read about all these changes in the PixiJS Migration Guide. Also big congrats to PixiJS for being part of the open source community for ten... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Advice about useful libraries to create a 2D car game (hill climb racing style)
    I would need a renderer to display the graphics of my calculations on the "backend". After some research I think pixijs which is written in TS could be a great tool. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is programming just not for me?
    And if that seems to up your alley you could look into Javascript game/renderer frameworks. They have 2D engines like https://github.com/photonstorm/phaser or https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs . Or my personal choice A-Frame which is a 3D, AR and VR engine (XR) https://github.com/aframevr/ . Source: over 2 years ago
  • Pixie – A full-featured 2D graphics library for Nim
    This has a high risk of being confused with pixi.js: https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Custome game engine: what stack ?
    WebGL, I hear, has a similar API to OpenGL. (Also, WebGPU is coming at some point.) Or, you could use a thin library that handles the WebGL drawing of sprites for you. I prefer that option over using a full game engine: I find it's better to only include dependencies when they become necessary. I recently tried a web rendering library called PixiJS, and it seemed like a pretty clean and nice-sized API, and... Source: almost 4 years ago

JointJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JointJS yet. Tracking of JointJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Pixi.js and JointJS, you can also consider the following products

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

GoJS - GoJS is a JavaScript library for building interactive diagrams on HTML web pages. Build apps with flowcharts, org charts, BPMN, UML, modeling, and other visual graph types.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

mxGraph - mxGraph is a fully client side JavaScript diagramming library - jgraph/mxgraph

D3.js - D3.js is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. D3 helps you bring data to life using HTML, SVG, and CSS.

Draw2D - Create Visio like drawings, diagrams or an workflow editor with the Draw2D Javascript library.