Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Pixi.js VS Animo.js

Compare Pixi.js VS Animo.js and see what are their differences

Pixi.js logo Pixi.js

Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

Animo.js logo Animo.js

Animo.js is a lightweight, open-source tool that enables developers to manipulate animations and transitions.
  • Pixi.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-14
Not present

Pixi.js features and specs

  • High Performance
    Pixi.js utilizes WebGL to deliver high-performance rendering, which is ideal for building fast and responsive web applications and games.
  • Cross-Platform
    It supports multiple platforms, allowing developers to build applications that work seamlessly across different devices, including desktops, tablets, and smartphones.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Pixi.js has comprehensive and well-documented resources that help developers understand how to use the library effectively, including tutorials and examples.
  • Rich Feature Set
    The library comes with a wide range of features such as textures, sprites, and filters, enabling developers to create visually complex and appealing content.
  • Active Community
    Pixi.js benefits from a large and active community, which means frequent updates, a wealth of plugins, and abundant community support.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source library, Pixi.js is free to use and modify, making it accessible to developers with different levels of expertise and budgets.

Possible disadvantages of Pixi.js

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its extensive documentation, beginners may find Pixi.js challenging to learn and integrate into their projects because of its extensive feature set.
  • WebGL Dependencies
    While WebGL provides high performance, it can also cause compatibility issues on older devices or browsers that do not fully support WebGL.
  • Limited 3D Capabilities
    Pixi.js is primarily a 2D rendering engine, so it may not be suitable for projects that require advanced 3D graphics and interactions.
  • Size
    Compared to simpler libraries, Pixi.js can be relatively large in terms of file size, which could impact the loading times of web applications, especially on slower networks.
  • Complex Debugging
    Debugging issues in Pixi.js can be complex, especially in large applications, as it often involves low-level graphics operations and WebGL debugging tools.

Animo.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Animo.js is a lightweight JavaScript library, which means it doesn't add much overhead to web projects and is quick to load.
  • Ease of Use
    The library provides a simple and intuitive API for creating animations, making it accessible even for beginners.
  • Chainable Animations
    Animo.js supports chaining animations, allowing developers to easily sequence multiple animations for more complex effects.
  • No Dependencies
    It does not require any external libraries like jQuery, making it easy to integrate into projects without additional dependencies.

Possible disadvantages of Animo.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive animation libraries, Animo.js offers a limited set of features, which might not be suitable for all projects.
  • Community and Support
    Being a smaller library, it might not have a large community for support or extensive documentation compared to more popular libraries.
  • Performance
    For very complex animations or high-performance scenarios, native CSS animations or more advanced libraries may be more efficient.
  • Browser Compatibility
    While generally reliable, there might be compatibility issues on older or less commonly used browsers that developers need to test for.

Pixi.js videos

PixiJS Crash Course

Animo.js videos

No Animo.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Pixi.js and Animo.js)
Javascript UI Libraries
76 76%
24% 24
Development
62 62%
38% 38
Charting Libraries
68 68%
32% 32
Tool
55 55%
45% 45

User comments

Share your experience with using Pixi.js and Animo.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pixi.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Pixi.js mentions (5)

  • Release Radar • March 2024 Edition
    If you're into video game dev, then PixiJS is something you need to know about. It's a HTML5 game engine that provides a lightweight 2D library across all devices. This latest update has a new package structure, custom builds, graphics API overhaul, and lots more. You can read about all these changes in the PixiJS Migration Guide. Also big congrats to PixiJS for being part of the open source community for ten... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Advice about useful libraries to create a 2D car game (hill climb racing style)
    I would need a renderer to display the graphics of my calculations on the "backend". After some research I think pixijs which is written in TS could be a great tool. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is programming just not for me?
    And if that seems to up your alley you could look into Javascript game/renderer frameworks. They have 2D engines like https://github.com/photonstorm/phaser or https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs . Or my personal choice A-Frame which is a 3D, AR and VR engine (XR) https://github.com/aframevr/ . Source: over 2 years ago
  • Pixie – A full-featured 2D graphics library for Nim
    This has a high risk of being confused with pixi.js: https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Custome game engine: what stack ?
    WebGL, I hear, has a similar API to OpenGL. (Also, WebGPU is coming at some point.) Or, you could use a thin library that handles the WebGL drawing of sprites for you. I prefer that option over using a full game engine: I find it's better to only include dependencies when they become necessary. I recently tried a web rendering library called PixiJS, and it seemed like a pretty clean and nice-sized API, and... Source: almost 4 years ago

Animo.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Animo.js yet. Tracking of Animo.js recommendations started around Jul 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Pixi.js and Animo.js, you can also consider the following products

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

Magic Animations CSS3 - CSS3 Animations with special effects.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Move.js - Move.js is a mini Javascript library that provides CSS3 animations.

D3.js - D3.js is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. D3 helps you bring data to life using HTML, SVG, and CSS.

Three.js - A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.