Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

pipenv VS DPKG (Debian Package Manager)

Compare pipenv VS DPKG (Debian Package Manager) and see what are their differences

pipenv logo pipenv

Python Development Workflow for Humans. Contribute to pypa/pipenv development by creating an account on GitHub.

DPKG (Debian Package Manager) logo DPKG (Debian Package Manager)

dpkg is the core of package management in Debian-based Linux distributions. it has multiple front ends like apt or aptitude that extend dpkgs usability and features
  • pipenv Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-26
  • DPKG (Debian Package Manager) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-25

pipenv features and specs

  • Integrated Workflow
    Pipenv combines the functionalities of pip and virtualenv, providing a seamless environment for package installation and management, making the development workflow more efficient and organized.
  • Automatic Virtual Environment Management
    Automatically creates and manages a virtual environment for projects, ensuring that dependencies are maintained separately and do not interfere with the system Python or other projects.
  • Lock File Generation
    Generates a Pipfile.lock to ensure deterministic builds, making sure that installations are consistent across different environments or deployments.
  • User-Friendly Package Installation
    Simplifies package installation with a straightforward and intuitive interface. Pipenv handles both direct package specification and environment management in a unified manner.
  • Environment Consistency
    By using the Pipfile and Pipfile.lock, Pipenv ensures that all developers working on a project have a consistent set of dependencies, reducing 'it works on my machine' issues.
  • Dependency Resolution
    Pipenv uses an advanced dependency resolver, helping to avoid dependency conflicts that can occur with complex package requirements.

Possible disadvantages of pipenv

  • Performance Overhead
    The dependency resolution process can sometimes be slow, which might be noticeable in larger projects or when installing multiple packages at once.
  • Limited Flexibility
    Pipenv abstracts away some of pip and virtualenv’s flexibility, which might limit advanced configurations or setups required by more complex projects.
  • Complexity for Simple Projects
    May add unnecessary complexity for simple or small projects where virtualenv and pip would suffice without additional layers.
  • Slower Updates
    Pipenv may lag behind updates compared to pip and virtualenv due to its additional integration layer, meaning it might not always provide immediate support for the latest Python packaging developments.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires initial learning and adjustment for developers who are accustomed to using pip and virtualenv separately, potentially slowing down onboarding for new team members.

DPKG (Debian Package Manager) features and specs

  • Efficiency
    DPKG is a low-level package manager that directly manages .deb packages, making it highly efficient for package installation, removal, and configuration.
  • Control
    Provides detailed control over package installation and management, allowing administrators to manually handle package files and their configurations.
  • Dependency Management
    Although DPKG itself does not resolve dependencies, it works seamlessly with other tools like APT to help manage them effectively.
  • Wide Adoption
    Being the standard package manager for Debian, it has widespread use and support in the Debian community, offering many resources and documentation.

Possible disadvantages of DPKG (Debian Package Manager)

  • Complexity
    As a low-level tool, DPKG requires a deeper understanding of the system to manage packages efficiently, which can be complex for new users.
  • Lack of Dependency Resolution
    DPKG does not automatically handle dependencies, which can lead to issues if packages require specific dependencies that aren't manually addressed by the user.
  • Limited Features
    Being a core tool, DPKG has a limited feature set compared to higher-level package managers that can handle more advanced tasks such as source management and package searching.
  • Potential for System Instability
    Incorrect usage of DPKG, such as forcing package installs without resolving dependencies, can potentially lead to system instability or broken packages.

pipenv videos

Pipenv Crash Course

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to use Pipenv to Manage Python Dependencies (Tutorial)
  • Review - venv, pyenv, pypi, pip, pipenv, pyWTF?

DPKG (Debian Package Manager) videos

No DPKG (Debian Package Manager) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to pipenv and DPKG (Debian Package Manager))
Front End Package Manager
Package Manager
45 45%
55% 55
Kids
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
46 46%
54% 54

User comments

Share your experience with using pipenv and DPKG (Debian Package Manager). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pipenv seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

pipenv mentions (6)

  • Generate pip requirements.txt file based on imports of any project
    https://github.com/pypa/pipenv Pipenv was last updated 10 hours ago. Looks like it's still an active project to me. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Adding Virtual Environments to Git Repo
    Pipenv solves this by having both kinds of requirement files: Pipfile lists package names and known constraints on which versions can be used, while Pipfile.lock gives specific package versions with hashes. Theoretically the Pipfile (and its lockfile) format were supposed to be a standard that many different tools could use, but I haven't seen it get adopted much outside of pipenv itself, so I'm not sure if it's... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Top 10 Python security best practices
    Alternatively, you can look into Pipenv, which has a lot more tools to develop secure applications with. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Why and how to use conda?
    I’m partial to pipenv but it does depend on pyenv (which works on Windows albeit via WSL, no?). Source: about 3 years ago
  • How to make a Python package in 2021
    I think I went through the same progression — thinking pipenv was the official solution before deciding it isn’t. To add to the confusion, I just realized that pipenv [1] is currently owned by the Python Packaging Authority (PyPA) which also owns the official pip [2] and virtualenv [3]. [1]: https://github.com/pypa/pipenv [2]: https://github.com/pypa/pip [3]: https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
View more

DPKG (Debian Package Manager) mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of DPKG (Debian Package Manager) yet. Tracking of DPKG (Debian Package Manager) recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing pipenv and DPKG (Debian Package Manager), you can also consider the following products

Python Poetry - Python packaging and dependency manager.

Conda - Binary package manager with support for environments.

Docker - Docker is an open platform that enables developers and system administrators to create distributed applications.

pip - The PyPA recommended tool for installing Python packages.

pkgsrc - pkgsrc is a framework for building over 17,000 open source software packages.

envd - Machine learning development environment for data science and AI/ML engineering teams.