Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Ping Bot VS Roda Framework

Compare Ping Bot VS Roda Framework and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Ping Bot logo Ping Bot

Reliable monitoring for your servers, vendors, and infrastructure.

Roda Framework logo Roda Framework

Roda is a lightweight and productive framework for building web applications in Ruby.
  • Ping Bot Monitor details
    Monitor details //
    2024-06-28
  • Ping Bot Response time
    Response time //
    2024-06-28
  • Ping Bot Monitor 3rd party vendors
    Monitor 3rd party vendors //
    2024-06-28

Ping Bot helps you not only monitor your websites, databases, and infrastructure, but your third party vendors as well. Stay informed about the services you rely on.

Does your AI app use OpenAI's API? Get notified when they have an outage. Are you hosting with Vercel? Be the first to know about scheduled maintenance that could take you offline. Stop hearing about broken integrations from customers and monitor your external dependencies.

Ping Bot integrates with dozens of vendors, with more being added daily.

  • Roda Framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-11-26

Ping Bot

$ Details
freemium $19.0 / Monthly
Release Date
2024 May
Startup details
Country
United States
State
Nebraska

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ping Bot and Roda Framework)
Website Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Ping Bot and Roda Framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Roda Framework seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ping Bot mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Ping Bot yet. Tracking of Ping Bot recommendations started around Jun 2024.

Roda Framework mentions (3)

  • It's not Ruby that's slow, it's your database
    Personal opinion, if I was going to use htmx with a PORO backend I'd probably go for Roda[1] and Sequel. If it was going to be read heavy I think I'd also pair that with SQLite for low latency and cheaper deployments. If I didn't know exactly how requirements are likely to change over time I'd probably go with with Rails, Postgres[2], Redis and Hotwire. You can go a long way with that and a small team. 1. ... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • To Ruby from Python
    This is personal opinion but these days I'd probably swap Sinatra for Roda[1] for small API services. It's generally faster, uses less memory and is a really good example of well written ruby code, IMHO. I also really like Jeremy Evans' book, Polished Ruby. 1. http://roda.jeremyevans.net/index.html. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Don't make me think, or why I switched to Rails from JavaScript SPAs
    It’s not really true that there are no other options for web development in ruby. Roda[1], for instance, has a strong following for API work. It’s just that Rails is a safe choice. 1. http://roda.jeremyevans.net/index.html. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ping Bot and Roda Framework, you can also consider the following products

UptimeRobot - Free Website Uptime Monitoring

Sinatra - Classy web-development dressed in a DSL

Better Uptime - We call you when your website goes down

Padrino - Padrino is a Ruby web framework built upon the Sinatra web library.

Uptime Kuma - A fancy self-hosted monitoring tool.

Cuba - Cuba is a Ruby microframework for web development.