Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PIKT VS Apache Subversion

Compare PIKT VS Apache Subversion and see what are their differences

PIKT logo PIKT

PIKT is cross-categorical, multi-purpose software for monitoring and configuring computer systems, administering networks, organizing system security, and more.

Apache Subversion logo Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.
  • PIKT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-11-26
  • Apache Subversion Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

PIKT features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Apache Subversion features and specs

  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Subversion

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVN’s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

PIKT videos

No PIKT videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Apache Subversion videos

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PIKT and Apache Subversion)
Code Collaboration
12 12%
88% 88
Git
11 11%
89% 89
Git Tools
22 22%
78% 78
Version Control
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PIKT and Apache Subversion. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PIKT and Apache Subversion, you can also consider the following products

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Perforce - Self-hosted Version Control Software

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

GitBucket - GitBucket is the easily installable open-source GitHub clone written with Scala.

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service