Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PhpMoAdmin VS rkt

Compare PhpMoAdmin VS rkt and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

PhpMoAdmin logo PhpMoAdmin

MongoDB GUI administration tool for PHP. Built on a stripped-down version of the Vork PHP framework

rkt logo rkt

App Container runtime
  • PhpMoAdmin Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-28
  • rkt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08

PhpMoAdmin features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    PhpMoAdmin offers a graphical user interface that is easy to navigate, which simplifies database management compared to using the MongoDB shell.
  • Lightweight
    The tool is relatively lightweight and easy to install, requiring only a PHP server environment to run.
  • Web-based
    Being a web-based tool, PhpMoAdmin can be accessed from anywhere with an internet connection, providing flexibility for remote database management.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, PhpMoAdmin can be modified and extended by developers to better fit specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of PhpMoAdmin

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive solutions like MongoDB Compass, PhpMoAdmin lacks advanced features such as aggregation pipeline visualization and performance optimization tools.
  • Security Concerns
    Running a database interface over the web can pose security risks if not properly configured, potentially exposing sensitive data.
  • Deprecated
    PhpMoAdmin has not been actively maintained or updated, leading to potential compatibility issues with newer versions of MongoDB and PHP.
  • PHP Dependency
    The reliance on a PHP environment could be a hindrance for those who do not use PHP in their tech stack or prefer a different runtime.

rkt features and specs

  • Compatibility
    rkt supports the App Container (appc) spec and can also run Docker container images, providing flexibility and compatibility with various container formats.
  • Security
    rkt is designed with security in mind, offering features like process isolation through Linux namespaces, user namespaces, and SELinux/AppArmor integration.
  • Isolation
    rkt runs applications in their own stage1 environments, ensuring strong isolation between containers and better resource management.
  • Modularity
    rkt is built with a modular architecture, allowing users to swap out the stage1 implementation to better fit their needs.
  • Lightweight
    rkt avoids running a central daemon, thus using fewer system resources and simplifying debugging and monitoring.

Possible disadvantages of rkt

  • Maturity
    rkt is not as mature as Docker, meaning it may lack some features and integrations that have been developed for Docker.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    rkt has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Docker, which may limit the availability of third-party tools and support.
  • Adoption
    rkt has lower adoption rates, leading to fewer tutorials, guides, and community-driven content, which can make the learning curve steeper.
  • Development Activity
    rkt's development and maintenance activity is not as high as Docker's, which could impact long-term viability and feature development.
  • Enterprise Support
    Enterprise-grade support and services for rkt may not be as widely available or comprehensive as those for Docker.

PhpMoAdmin videos

No PhpMoAdmin videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

rkt videos

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

More videos:

  • Review - 2018 Niner RKT 9 RDO - First Look and Build Kit Overview
  • Review - Best Stock Picks Today | RKT Stock 9-2-20

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PhpMoAdmin and rkt)
Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
MySQL Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PhpMoAdmin and rkt. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare PhpMoAdmin and rkt

PhpMoAdmin Reviews

We have no reviews of PhpMoAdmin yet.
Be the first one to post

rkt Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PhpMoAdmin and rkt, you can also consider the following products

Studio 3T - The perfect match for your MongoDB team

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

mongo-express - Web-based MongoDB admin interface written with Node.js, Express and Bootstrap3

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

MongoDB Compass - The easiest way to explore and manipulate your MongoDB data

Apache ServiceMix - Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.