Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

particles.js VS esbuild

Compare particles.js VS esbuild and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

particles.js logo particles.js

A lightweight JavaScript library for creating particles.

esbuild logo esbuild

An extremely fast JavaScript bundler and minifier
  • particles.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-13
  • esbuild Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-05-07

particles.js features and specs

  • Easy Integration
    Particles.js can be easily integrated into web projects using simple HTML and JavaScript. It doesn't require any complex setup, making it accessible for developers of all skill levels.
  • Customizability
    The library offers a high degree of customizability, allowing developers to adjust parameters such as particle count, color, shape, size, and animation effects to suit their specific design needs.
  • Smooth Animations
    Particles.js provides smooth and visually appealing animations that enhance the interactive aspects of a website without significant performance drawbacks on modern browsers.
  • Lightweight
    Particles.js is relatively lightweight, which means it won’t significantly increase the load time of your site, ensuring a snappy user experience.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, it allows developers to contribute to the project, customize it further, or use it freely in both personal and commercial projects.

Possible disadvantages of particles.js

  • Performance Issues on Low-End Devices
    While it performs well on modern devices, low-end devices may experience lag or performance issues, especially with high particle counts.
  • Limited Interactivity
    The built-in interactive features are somewhat limited. For developers seeking complex interactivity, additional custom code might be necessary.
  • Not SEO Friendly
    Since particles.js generates a canvas-based animation, it does not contribute to search engine optimization (SEO) as search engines primarily index text content.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    The library is entirely dependent on JavaScript. Thus, if a user's browser has JavaScript disabled, the particle effects will not function.
  • Potential for Overuse
    There is a risk that overuse or overcomplexity of particle effects could lead to distraction or interfere with the user experience if not implemented judiciously.

esbuild features and specs

  • Speed
    esbuild is known for its blazing-fast performance because it is written in Go and optimized for efficiency. This makes it significantly faster than many other popular build tools.
  • Simplicity
    esbuild has a minimalistic and straightforward configuration, making it easy to set up and use without needing to navigate through complex configuration files.
  • Tree Shaking
    esbuild supports tree shaking, which helps in eliminating dead code, thereby resulting in smaller bundle sizes and improved performance.
  • TypeScript Support
    esbuild has built-in support for TypeScript, allowing developers to seamlessly integrate TypeScript into their build process without needing additional configuration.
  • CommonJS and ES Module Support
    esbuild supports both CommonJS and ES modules, providing flexibility in how modules are imported and exported.
  • Bundling
    esbuild can bundle multiple JavaScript files, resolving dependencies and optimizing the output, which is beneficial for production-ready applications.

Possible disadvantages of esbuild

  • Limited Plugin Ecosystem
    Compared to more mature tools like Webpack or Rollup, esbuild has a relatively smaller ecosystem of plugins, which might limit some advanced customization and integration capabilities.
  • Less Mature
    As a newer tool, esbuild might have less extensive community support and fewer resources such as tutorials and documentation compared to older and more established build tools.
  • Feature Parity
    While esbuild covers many essential features, it may lack some advanced features found in other build tools, potentially requiring additional tools or workarounds for complex scenarios.
  • Non-Configurable Output
    esbuild's approach to simplicity sometimes means less configurability compared to other tools. This might be restrictive for projects that require highly customized or specific build outputs.
  • Source Map Support
    While esbuild does support source maps, its support might be less comprehensive compared to some other build tools, potentially causing issues during debugging.

particles.js videos

No particles.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

esbuild videos

ESBuild and SWC: Worth your time?

More videos:

  • Review - Let's talk about esbuild
  • Tutorial - Introduction to ESBuild tutorial for React / JavaScript and Typescript bundling. Bye bye Webpack

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to particles.js and esbuild)
Javascript UI Libraries
58 58%
42% 42
JS Build Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using particles.js and esbuild. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, esbuild seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 142 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

particles.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of particles.js yet. Tracking of particles.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

esbuild mentions (142)

  • Understanding how Vite deals with your node_modules
    Pre-bundle all the dependencies on the "optimization boundary" list into node_modules/.vite/deps/ folder. This step is done by esbuild. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Show HN: Nue – Apps lighter than a React button
    5. Show me metrics: https://esbuild.github.io/ nailed this one. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Extensible WASM Applications with Go
    ESBuild is a bundler. The subtitle on the website is literally “An extremely fast bundler for the web”. To bundle, pass —-bundle flag. https://esbuild.github.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • How I Built a SpeedtestTracker with Raspberry PI and AWS Lambda
    Esbuild for bunding both the client and server separately. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Custom builder for Angular: My way
    Micro-frontend has always aroused my curiosity: I wanted to understand how they work, how to build them, what their pros and cons are. In 2018, inspired by this topic, I tried to build something similar to single-spa in one of the pet projects. At that time, there was no Webpack Module Federation (WMF), and Webpack itself seemed inconvenient. The choice fell on ESBuild and importmap. Browser support for importmap... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing particles.js and esbuild, you can also consider the following products

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

Vite - Next Generation Frontend Tooling

Pixi.js - Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.