Software Alternatives & Reviews

Parcel VS esbuild

Compare Parcel VS esbuild and see what are their differences

Parcel logo Parcel

Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler

esbuild logo esbuild

An extremely fast JavaScript bundler and minifier
  • Parcel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-13
Not present

Parcel videos

Danby Parcel Guard Smart Mailbox blogger Review

More videos:

  • Review - PARCEL MOVIE REVIEW | SASWATA CHATTERJEE | RITUPARNA SENGUPTA | RUPAM'S REVIEW
  • Review - Le Parcel Box review

esbuild videos

ESBuild and SWC: Worth your time?

More videos:

  • Review - Let's talk about esbuild
  • Tutorial - Introduction to ESBuild tutorial for React / JavaScript and Typescript bundling. Bye bye Webpack

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Parcel and esbuild)
Web Application Bundler
73 73%
27% 27
JS Build Tools
43 43%
57% 57
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Assets Bundler
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Parcel and esbuild. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Parcel and esbuild

Parcel Reviews

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Parcel's caching feature sees dramatically decreases in time consumption after the initial run. For frequent, small changes, in smaller projects **Parcel*8 is a great choice.
Source: x-team.com
If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!
document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero...
Source: medium.com
First impressions with Parcel JS
The big selling point of Parcel though is that it offers a zero configuration experience. This means all the features are available out of the box! It also boasts blazing fast bundle times 👟 You won’t be configuring how Parcel works or having to draft in various plugins to get started. If you do need something, Parcel magically detects this and will pull in stuff for you on...
Source: codeburst.io
Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind
Parcel has made their own benchmarks of Parcel and other bundlers. Parcel has been criticized because they have not made the benchmarks open source. People cannot verify that the benchmarks are true when they are not open source.

esbuild Reviews

We have no reviews of esbuild yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

esbuild might be a bit more popular than Parcel. We know about 120 links to it since March 2021 and only 100 links to Parcel. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Parcel mentions (100)

  • React Server Components Example with Next.js
    In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldn’t find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I can’t say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask
    Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Building Node.js applications without dependencies
    I’ve tried something similar on the frontend side: I decided to build a UI for Ollama.ai using only HTML, CSS, and JS (Single-Page Application). The goal is to learn something new and have zero runtime dependencies on other projects and NPM modules. Only Node and Parcel.js (https://parceljs.org/) are needed during development for serving files, bundling, etc. The only runtime dependency is a modern browser. Here's... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • 11 Ways to Optimize Your Website
    Besides Webpack, there are many other popular web bundlers available, such as Parcel, Esbuild, Rollup, and more. They all have their own unique features and strengths, and you should make your decision based on the needs and requirements of your specific project. Please refer to their official websites for details. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Bun vs Node.js: Everything you need to know
    In the Node.js ecosystem, bundling is typically handled by third-party tools rather than Node.js itself. Some of the most popular bundlers in the Node.js world include Webpack, Rollup, and Parcel, offering features like code splitting, tree shaking, and hot module replacement. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

esbuild mentions (120)

  • Use Notion as your CMS along with Next.js
    During my search for deploying Lambdas via GitHub actions, I came across a tutorial that utilized ncc for converting TypeScript and bundling. While ncc is effective, I discovered esbuild, which proved to be significantly faster and perfectly suited to my requirements. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
  • ⏰ It’s time to talk about Import Map, Micro Frontend, and Nx Monorepo
    The advent of esbuild, the native support for ES Modules in browsers, the widespread adoption of import map, the emergence of tools like Native Federation, and the Nx ecosystem all combine to forge a flexible and well-maintained Micro Frontend Architecture. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview
    In part 3 We jump into the world of bundlers, comparing webpack, esbuild, vite, and parcel 2. This section aims to guide developers through each bundler, focusing on their performance, compatibility, and ease of use. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask
    Unlike Webpack, the Vite DevServer only compiles files when they are requested. It leverages ES module imports, which allow JS files to import other files without needing to bundle them together during development. When one file changes, only that file needs to be re-compiled, and the rest can remain unchanged. Project files are compiled with Rollup.js. Third-party dependencies in node_modules are pre-compiled... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Effortless Function as a Service: A Simple Guide to Implementing it with Query
    The functions will bundle using esbuild. For that, it is required to install esbuild globally:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Parcel and esbuild, you can also consider the following products

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

Vite - Next Generation Frontend Tooling

17track - All-in-one package tracking

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.

AfterShip - AfterShip is the shipment tracking API for ecommerce businesses and marketplaces.

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces