Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Papers with Code VS arXiv

Compare Papers with Code VS arXiv and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Papers with Code logo Papers with Code

The latest in machine learning at your fingerprints

arXiv logo arXiv

arXiv is a free distribution service and an open-access archive for scholarly articles.
  • Papers with Code Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-17
  • arXiv Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-23

Papers with Code features and specs

  • Open Access
    Papers with Code provides free access to a vast repository of research papers and code implementations, making cutting-edge research available to a wider audience.
  • Reproducibility
    By linking research papers with their corresponding code, it promotes reproducibility, allowing researchers to verify results and build upon previous work more effectively.
  • Benchmarking
    The platform offers benchmarking tools and leaderboards, facilitating the comparison of different models and approaches on standard datasets and fostering competition in the research community.
  • Community Engagement
    Researchers and developers can contribute their own code and evaluations, which encourages community collaboration and the sharing of knowledge.
  • Resource Saving
    By providing implementations and datasets, it saves researchers time and resources, enabling them to focus on innovation rather than recreating existing work.

Possible disadvantages of Papers with Code

  • Quality Control
    Not all code implementations are thoroughly vetted or peer-reviewed, which can lead to issues with code quality and reliability.
  • Misalignment of Benchmarks
    Benchmarks and evaluations might not perfectly align with certain niche or novel research tasks, potentially skewing perceptions about model performance.
  • Dependence on Contributor Participation
    The platform relies heavily on community contributions; if participation wanes, the updates and breadth of resources could stagnate.
  • Integration Challenges
    Integrating and adapting third-party code into different environments or existing projects can sometimes be challenging due to dependencies or compatibility issues.
  • Information Overload
    With a vast amount of available papers and code, navigating and finding the most relevant and high-quality resources can be overwhelming for users.

arXiv features and specs

  • Open Access
    arXiv offers free access to a wide range of scientific papers, providing open access to high-quality research without paywalls.
  • Rapid Dissemination
    Researchers can quickly share their findings with the global community, potentially accelerating scientific progress.
  • Large Repository
    With millions of papers in various fields such as physics, computer science, and mathematics, arXiv is a comprehensive resource for researchers.
  • Preprints
    Authors can share their manuscripts before formal peer review, which allows for immediate feedback and increased visibility.
  • Community and Collaborations
    arXiv fosters a collaborative environment where researchers can easily find and build on each other's work.

Possible disadvantages of arXiv

  • Lack of Peer Review
    Papers submitted to arXiv are not peer-reviewed, which means the quality and reliability of the content can vary.
  • Overwhelming Volume
    The sheer number of papers can make it difficult to find relevant and high-quality research.
  • Variable Quality
    Since submissions are not vetted through a rigorous peer review process, the quality of papers can range from excellent to poor.
  • Potential for Plagiarism
    The open nature of arXiv can sometimes lead to issues with plagiarism or uncredited use of ideas.
  • Not Recognized by Some Journals
    Some academic journals do not consider papers uploaded to arXiv as unpublished, which can affect a researcher’s ability to publish in those journals.

Papers with Code videos

+ Add

The best site for research papers with codes on Machine/Deep Learning | Research paper search

More videos:

  • Review - Papers With Code Machine Learning Papers and Code Free Resource

arXiv videos

+ Add

How to submit a paper to arxiv

More videos:

  • Review - Do Research on arXiv
  • Review - RNAAS banned on arXiv

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Papers with Code and arXiv)

Papers with Code

arXiv

AI
100 100%
AI
0% 0
Education
0 0%
Education
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Ebooks
0 0%
Ebooks
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Papers with Code and arXiv. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, arXiv should be more popular than Papers with Code. It has been mentiond 321 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Papers with Code mentions (99)

  • Computer Vision Made Simple with ReductStore and Roboflow
    An helpful approach is to browse the state of the art models in paperswithcode. This will give you an idea of the performance of different models on various tasks. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Show HN: Simple Science – The Newest Science Explained Simply
    I think a way around this would some sort of voting/ popularity system? Papers with code (https://paperswithcode.com/) does this via Github stars sorting. Sure it doesn't mean something is established. But it at least gives some way to filter through the firehose of papers. Love this project btw! I think it has potential (and the timing is right now that everyone is looking for the next "attention is all... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Essential Deep Learning Checklist: Best Practices Unveiled
    Adapting to Evolving Standards: With the rapid progress in deep learning research and applications, staying current with the latest developments is crucial. The checklist underscores the importance of considering established standard architectures and leveraging current state-of-the-art (SOTA) resources, like paperswithcode.com, to guide project decisions. This dynamic approach ensures that projects benefit from... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Understanding Technical Research Papers
    Papers With Code is one of the good resources to get you to get started. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Is there a data set for GitHub repos associated with academic papers?
    For ML/DL papers you can check https://paperswithcode.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

arXiv mentions (321)

  • Creating an arXiv DB
    As a Ph.D. Student studying Deep Learning (DL) from the perspective of a Software Engineer, I rely upon academic resources to learn about DL models, techniques, and methods. Arxiv is arguably the largest host of the latest academic (but not peer-reviewed) DL manuscripts. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • The 6 Best LLM Tools To Run Models Locally
    To answer the above questions, you can check excellent resources like Hugging Face and Arxiv.org. Also, Open LLm Leaderboard and LMSYS Chatbot Arena provide detailed information and benchmarks for varieties of LLMs. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Proof of P ≠ NP
    Would it be better to post the paper on https://arxiv.org/ or speak with your local university mathematics department. These would be far more qualified to assess a proof than HN. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • AI Research Agent with memory using GPT-4o-mini: Step-by-Step Guide.
    If st.button('Search for Papers'): with st. Spinner ('Searching and Processing...'): relevant memories = memory.search(search_query, user_id=user_id, limit=3) prompt = f "Search for arXiv papers: {search_query}\nUser background: {' '.join(mem['text'] for mem in relevant_memories)}" result = process_with_gpt4 (multion.browse (cmd=prompt, url="https://arxiv.org/")) st.markdown (result). - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Research as Leisure Activity
    One of the things that stands in the way of this (for me) is that I've been out of academia for nearly ten years. I never even got verified for submitting CS pre-prints https://arxiv.org/ for example, which I should have done before leaving school. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Papers with Code and arXiv, you can also consider the following products

ML5.js - Friendly machine learning for the web

SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers

Amazon Machine Learning - Machine learning made easy for developers of any skill level

Google Scholar - Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...

Machine Learning Playground - Breathtaking visuals for learning ML techniques.

Unpaywall - Legally read research papers behind paywalls.

Loading...