Paper Programs VS A.I. Experiments by Google

If you just want the projector and the camera stuff there's https://paperprograms.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

I see how that might be constructed as a negative, but IMO it's too early to tell whether that's a genuine setback to the project. "Protecting his baby" might be a very wise decision at this point, if only because of how the reception generally goes; pigeonholing the project into something like "an AR coding environment" or "visual programming with projectors" is a very real risk that could damage the project's... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

Try this: https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai. Source: over 1 year ago

But Google has a whole set of AI writing tools - https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai So by their own definition they are producing spam? - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai might also help (I haven't used this IRL). Source: over 2 years ago

It's hard to imagine you've not seen Google's doodle guessing training (or their other experiments) but it's just another example of how little information you actually need to create a recognizable image, though Canvas also shows this off, but it has the benefit of material information. Source: over 2 years ago

To come back to your original question, as far as I'm aware anyone can publish on arxiv or researchgate. People will just tend to take you less serious. Maybe a better solution for you is something like this https://experiments.withgoogle.com/collection/ai . You already said you think your idea might be industry changing so if it truly is, I'm sure people will start noticing you. Source: almost 3 years ago