Page Speaker VS Kitemaker
Compare Page Speaker VS Kitemaker and see what are their differences
Fight user churn with great user onboarding. Interactive product tours and smart tips significantly improve your user retention.
featured
Page Speaker
accessiBe
Koa11y
tota11y
Accessible Metrics
Nibbler
Contraste
Stark
Kitemaker
Linear
Trello
Triage & Timeline by Linear
Shipped
Asana
Sifter
CoLab
98% of websites aren't accessible - but there is no silver bullet.
The scope of Page Speaker is twofold:
The first part of the product is the toolbar, which you can easily embed on as many of your web pages as you would like.
Here's a few of the toolbar's unique features:
📊 Unlimited pages and unlimited page views
⚡ Background loading (it doesn't slow down your site)
🔊 Built-in screen reader and many other features, such as "Seizure-safe mode"
But the toolbar alone won't get you to full WCAG compliance.
That's why we created Smart Audits.
This is a system to measure your compliance with seven (and counting) different international web accessibility regulations and technical specifications. It provides actionable insights into how you can improve your pages and make them more accessible right away.
P.S. - Agencies love us, because we uniquely offer multiple websites per license!
Page Speaker KitemakerNo features have been listed yet.
Based on our record, Kitemaker seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
When we built Kitemaker [0] we elected to not use CRDTs. We built our sync engine after reading the blog article Figma wrote about they didn't need CRDTs because they have the server arbitrating any conflicts. We ended up taking the same approach. It's worked out very well for us though in a tool like our "last one in wins" generally works fine and doesn't lead to a lot of surprises. For documents, we had to do... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
There is no one-size-fits-all approach to writing descriptions, so you need to figure out what works best for you and your team. However, seeing real-world examples might inspire you to find new ways to write them. Here are some examples from descriptions we have written for Kitemaker. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Kitemaker.co - Collaborate through all phases of the product development process and keep track of work across Slack, Discord, Figma, and Github. Unlimited users, unlimited spaces. Free plan up to 250 work items. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
At Kitemaker, we recently made the leap to Recoil.js for our React state management needs. Before using Recoil, Kitemaker used a simple state management solution built upon useReducer(). We built Kitemaker to be super fast, responding to every user interaction instantly. However, in organizations with lots of data, we sometimes had a difficult time achieving this due to unnecessary re-renders. Kitemaker has a sync... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Definitely feel your pain. We did a full OT implementation for our startup [0] and it was a beast. We based it on Slate.js which has a nice concept of operations that maps nicely to OT, but it was still a lot of work to get it working well (and there are still rough edges we try to improve all of the time). We did base it on Postgres in the backend so really looking forward to what the Supabase team comes up with... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
accessiBe - Making websites accessible to people with disabilities
Linear - Streamlined issue tracking for software teams
Koa11y - Automatically detect accessibility (a11y) issues on webpages
Trello - Infinitely flexible. Incredibly easy to use. Great mobile apps. It's free. Trello keeps track of everything, from the big picture to the minute details.
tota11y - An accessibility visualization toolkit from Khan Academy
Triage & Timeline by Linear - The issue tracking tool you'll enjoy using