Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Pacman VS Atlassian Bitbucket Server

Compare Pacman VS Atlassian Bitbucket Server and see what are their differences

Pacman logo Pacman

Pacman was developed to be the package manager for Arch Linux, and is also used by KDE-focused Chakra Linux.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server logo Atlassian Bitbucket Server

Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.
  • Pacman Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • Atlassian Bitbucket Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Pacman and Atlassian Bitbucket Server)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Git
0 0%
100% 100
Front End Package Manager
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Pacman and Atlassian Bitbucket Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pacman seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Pacman mentions (8)

  • How to build Software as a Service (SaaS) Notes application with mySQL/MariaDB and Apache in 300 lines of code
    Install Vely - you can use standard packaging tools such as apt, dnf, pacman or zypper. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Podman 4.3 on Artix Linux: Fix initialization issues
    It is not so difficult to install Podman on Artix Linux, based on Arch Linux and systemd-free. It's because pacman brings core packages: podman and qemu-base of QEMU. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Podman 4.3 on Artix Linux: Install
    Thanks to their package management system, pacman delivers Podman with a simple command line. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Pacman Wrapper for C++/Node
    Pacman is a front-end to libalpm ((library for Arch Linux Package Management) which is written in C, so you should be able to use the library from C++. See https://archlinux.org/pacman/ for information and links to the source code. Source: about 2 years ago
  • (Part 3) I have a base Artix (OpenRC) TTY installed in this VM, whatever you tell me to do, I will gladly accept. As long as it's creative.
    Also, the previous commenter said to do so without the Arch Wiki, they said nothing about man pages, the git documentation, or the Pacman homepage at https://archlinux.org/pacman/. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Atlassian Bitbucket Server mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Atlassian Bitbucket Server yet. Tracking of Atlassian Bitbucket Server recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Pacman and Atlassian Bitbucket Server, you can also consider the following products

Conda - Binary package manager with support for environments.

GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.

Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Yay - Yay is an AUR helper written in go, based on the design of yaourt, apacman and pacaur.

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.