No OWASP Dependency-Track videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, GitHub Sponsors should be more popular than OWASP Dependency-Track. It has been mentiond 43 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I've become interested in SBOM recently, and found there were great tools like https://dependencytrack.org/ for CycloneDX SBOMs, but all I have is SPDX SBOMs generated by GitHub. I decided to have a go at writing my own dependency track esque tool aiming to integrate with the APIs GitHub provides. It's pretty limited in functionality so far, but can give a high level summary of the types of licenses your... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
To detect these types of vulnerabilities, we should first and foremost know our dependencies and versions, and which of them have vulnerabilities. The OWASP Top 10 2021 identifies this need as A06:2021-Vulnerable and Outdated Components. OWASP has several tools for this, including Dependency Check and Dependency Track. These tools will warn about the use of components with vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Https://dependencytrack.org/ You just need to use one of the various tools out there to scan. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
OWASP Dependency Track - https://dependencytrack.org/. Source: about 1 year ago
I actually want to build the same thing you are after, and I think I’ll go for the setup you describe in idea 2. The tool you can use for this is Trivy (https://trivy.dev), have it generate a SBOM and send it to Dependencytrack (https://dependencytrack.org). Source: over 1 year ago
Another great way to contribute to the open-source community is by sponsoring projects that your company uses. GitHub Sponsors makes it easy for you to financially support projects or even contributors in a very public way. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
GitHub Sponsors was launched five years ago. For several years it was available only in a limited number of countries, but two years ago I could also join. I got a few sponsors, but nothing substantial came out of it. Now I'd like to invest some time an energy understanding it and trying to figure out how could I increase the monthly sponsorship I receive. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
> Sustainability and Monetization: How can open-source projects develop sustainable business models without compromising their core principles? GitHub has its Sponsors program[0]. You can still contribute code safe in the knowledge that you can bring home the bacon if you've managed to get people to sponsor you. [0] https://github.com/sponsors > Dependency and Corporate... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
A few alternatives for micro donations that people have mentioned: https://ko-fi.com/ https://github.com/sponsors https://www.buymeacoffee.com/ Any others, let me know. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
There have been steps forward in the direction of making donation easier: https://github.com/sponsors , which can serve as a "fiscal host." The advantage here is that the default rule at law for how a group of developers working together will be treated is partnership, which means joint and several liability. Working with a fiscal host partitions individual liability from group liability. But there are still open... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.
Open Collective - Recurring funding for groups.
FOSSA - Open source license compliance and dependency analysis
Patreon - Patreon enables fans to give ongoing support to their favorite creators.
WhiteSource - Find & fix security and compliance issues in open source libraries in real-time.
Ko-fi - Ko-fi offers a friendly way for content creators to get paid for their work.