Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

OSXFUSE VS win-sshfs

Compare OSXFUSE VS win-sshfs and see what are their differences

Fileport
The fastest way to send files over the internet featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

OSXFUSE logo OSXFUSE

FUSE for OS X allows you to extend OS X's native file handling capabilities via third-party...

win-sshfs logo win-sshfs

Mount a unix server location as a virtual Windows drive
  • OSXFUSE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-15
  • win-sshfs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15

OSXFUSE features and specs

  • User Space File Systems
    OSXFUSE allows the creation of fully functional file systems in user space. This facilitates development by not requiring changes to kernel code, reducing the risk of affecting system stability.
  • Flexibility
    Developers can implement a wide variety of file systems with different abstractions and benefits, tailored for specific tasks or unique applications.
  • Wide Range of Use Cases
    OSXFUSE supports various applications, from cloud storage solutions and encrypted file systems to unique file abstractions, making it versatile for different needs.
  • Community Support
    Being open-source, OSXFUSE benefits from community contributions, documentation, and shared implementations that can aid development and problem-solving.
  • Cross-Platform Development
    OSXFUSE's similarity to FUSE on other Unix-like systems simplifies cross-platform development and porting of file systems.

Possible disadvantages of OSXFUSE

  • Performance Overhead
    Running file system operations in user space can introduce additional latency compared to kernel-based file systems, potentially affecting performance.
  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring OSXFUSE and its corresponding file systems might be challenging, especially for users not familiar with terminal commands or file system concepts.
  • Security Concerns
    User space file systems could introduce security vulnerabilities if not implemented carefully, as bugs can lead to data corruption or unauthorized access.
  • Limited Kernel Integration
    Since OSXFUSE operates in user space, it may not have the same deep integration and performance optimizations available to in-kernel file systems.

win-sshfs features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Win-sshfs offers a graphical user interface that simplifies the process of mounting remote file systems over SSH, making it accessible to users who may not be familiar with command-line tools.
  • Secure Connection
    It utilizes SSH for secure connections, ensuring that data is encrypted during transfer between the local and remote systems.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, win-sshfs allows users to view, modify, and distribute the source code, which can enhance security and encourage community-driven improvements.

Possible disadvantages of win-sshfs

  • Stability Issues
    Some users report instability and occasional crashes, which might make it less reliable for critical applications or long-term usage.
  • Performance Limitations
    The performance may not be as robust as other solutions, particularly in scenarios that require handling large files or high-speed data transfers.
  • Limited Support
    As an open-source project, it may lack dedicated support or frequent updates, which can be a disadvantage for users who need ongoing assistance or enhancements.
  • Dependency on Dokan Library
    Win-sshfs relies on the Dokan library for its file system operations, meaning any issues or limitations within Dokan can affect win-sshfs's functionality.

OSXFUSE videos

+ Add

Apple: OSXFuse & VeraCrypt on Big Sur: OSXFuse seems to be missing on your machine (2 Solutions!!)

win-sshfs videos

+ Add

How To Install Win-SSHFS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OSXFUSE and win-sshfs)

OSXFUSE

win-sshfs

Cloud Storage
69 69%
Cloud Storage
31% 31
FTP Client
0 0%
FTP Client
100% 100
Storage
100 100%
Storage
0% 0
OS & Utilities
100 100%
OS & Utilities
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using OSXFUSE and win-sshfs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OSXFUSE seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 31 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OSXFUSE mentions (31)

  • Please someone save me from file sharing hell to windows
    I didn't exactly use any 'tutorial'. Assumming you can already SSH to the target machine, you just need to install both these pkgs then reboot to 1TR Recovery Mode and choosing Reduced Security and choose to enable Kernel Extension and then reboot again goto Security & Privacy and Allow the extension, and that's it you can now use it. Source: over 1 year ago
  • How do I fix this?
    Weird. Where did you download (lat/new)est MacFuse from? https://osxfuse.github.io/ I hope! Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What are some good resources for learning about low level disk/file IO?
    I lead a project that included shipping a filesystem driver and a virtual disk on Windows. What I did to learn the lower-level APIs, and perform initial testing on the driver, was write a "mirror" drive. The user-mode code pointed to a folder on disk, the driver made a virtual disk drive, and all reads and writes in the virtual disk drive went to the mirror folder. On Windows, you can implement something like that... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Possible to use VeraCrypt without OSXFuse
    "FUSE-T is a kext-less implementation of FUSE for macOS that uses NFS v4 local server instead of a kernel extension. The main motivation for this project is to replace macfuse (https://osxfuse.github.io/) that implements its own kext to make fuse work. With each version of macOS it's getting harder and harder to load kernel extensions. Apple strongly discourages it and, for this reason, software distributions... Source: about 2 years ago
  • mount harddisk with different formats
    Macos doesn’t support many Linux file system formats. You’ll have to use something like macFUSE https://osxfuse.github.io/. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

win-sshfs mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of win-sshfs yet. Tracking of win-sshfs recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OSXFUSE and win-sshfs, you can also consider the following products

Tuxera NTFS for Mac - Microsoft NTFS for Mac by Tuxera brings reliable read-write compatibility for all NTFS-formatted USB drives on your Mac. Try free for 15 days.

WinSCP - WinSCP is an open source free SFTP client and FTP client for Windows.

Mounty for NTFS - A tiny tool to re-mount write-protected NTFS volumes under Mac OS X 10.9+ in read-write mode.

SSHFS-Win - SSHFS-Win is a minimal port of SSHFS to Windows.

iBoysoft NTFS for Mac - Free download iBoysoft NTFS for Mac to read, write, mount, format NTFS drives on Mac and transfer files to NTFS drives on macOS Sonoma, macOS Ventura, macOS Monterey, macOS Big Sur, macOS Catalina, macOS Mojave, and macOS High Sierra.

WinFsp - WinFsp, Windows File System Proxy, is a set of software components for Windows computers that...

Loading...