Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OSXFUSE VS NetApp HCI

Compare OSXFUSE VS NetApp HCI and see what are their differences

OSXFUSE logo OSXFUSE

FUSE for OS X allows you to extend OS X's native file handling capabilities via third-party...

NetApp HCI logo NetApp HCI

NetApp HCI and SolidFire bring together the best of the public cloud and the private cloud to create a seamless user experience and to help you build a true hybrid multi cloud experience.
  • OSXFUSE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-15
  • NetApp HCI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-02

OSXFUSE features and specs

  • User Space File Systems
    OSXFUSE allows the creation of fully functional file systems in user space. This facilitates development by not requiring changes to kernel code, reducing the risk of affecting system stability.
  • Flexibility
    Developers can implement a wide variety of file systems with different abstractions and benefits, tailored for specific tasks or unique applications.
  • Wide Range of Use Cases
    OSXFUSE supports various applications, from cloud storage solutions and encrypted file systems to unique file abstractions, making it versatile for different needs.
  • Community Support
    Being open-source, OSXFUSE benefits from community contributions, documentation, and shared implementations that can aid development and problem-solving.
  • Cross-Platform Development
    OSXFUSE's similarity to FUSE on other Unix-like systems simplifies cross-platform development and porting of file systems.

Possible disadvantages of OSXFUSE

  • Performance Overhead
    Running file system operations in user space can introduce additional latency compared to kernel-based file systems, potentially affecting performance.
  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring OSXFUSE and its corresponding file systems might be challenging, especially for users not familiar with terminal commands or file system concepts.
  • Security Concerns
    User space file systems could introduce security vulnerabilities if not implemented carefully, as bugs can lead to data corruption or unauthorized access.
  • Limited Kernel Integration
    Since OSXFUSE operates in user space, it may not have the same deep integration and performance optimizations available to in-kernel file systems.

NetApp HCI features and specs

  • Scalability
    NetApp HCI offers flexible scaling, allowing users to independently scale storage and compute resources to meet changing workloads and performance demands.
  • Performance
    It provides high-performance storage capabilities, which are particularly beneficial for data-intensive applications, ensuring low latency and high throughput.
  • Efficiency
    NetApp HCI is designed for efficient resource utilization, reducing overhead and optimizing the use of available infrastructure resources.
  • Simplified Management
    The platform offers simplified management through a unified interface, which streamlines operations and reduces the complexity of managing hybrid cloud environments.
  • Integration
    It offers the ability to integrate with existing NetApp environments and public clouds, supporting hybrid cloud strategies and enabling data mobility and protection across different settings.

Possible disadvantages of NetApp HCI

  • Cost
    NetApp HCI can be more expensive than some other hyper-converged solutions, making it a substantial investment for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity of Initial Setup
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, requiring a learning curve for IT teams unfamiliar with NetApp's ecosystem.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    As with other integrated systems, there is a degree of vendor lock-in, which could limit flexibility in choosing alternative solutions in the future.
  • Limited Customization
    While the system is highly integrated, there might be limited customization options for organizations with specific or unique infrastructure requirements.
  • Resource Boundaries
    Despite its scalability promises, users might encounter resource boundaries within specific configurations, which requires careful planning and management.

OSXFUSE videos

Apple: OSXFuse & VeraCrypt on Big Sur: OSXFuse seems to be missing on your machine (2 Solutions!!)

NetApp HCI videos

Unboxing NetApp HCI, Hardware Tour

More videos:

  • Review - What You Get with NetApp HCI
  • Review - NetApp Element OS Platform Overview - SolidFire and NetApp HCI

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OSXFUSE and NetApp HCI)
Cloud Storage
59 59%
41% 41
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
Storage
66 66%
34% 34
OS & Utilities
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using OSXFUSE and NetApp HCI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OSXFUSE seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 31 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OSXFUSE mentions (31)

  • Please someone save me from file sharing hell to windows
    I didn't exactly use any 'tutorial'. Assumming you can already SSH to the target machine, you just need to install both these pkgs then reboot to 1TR Recovery Mode and choosing Reduced Security and choose to enable Kernel Extension and then reboot again goto Security & Privacy and Allow the extension, and that's it you can now use it. Source: over 1 year ago
  • How do I fix this?
    Weird. Where did you download (lat/new)est MacFuse from? https://osxfuse.github.io/ I hope! Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What are some good resources for learning about low level disk/file IO?
    I lead a project that included shipping a filesystem driver and a virtual disk on Windows. What I did to learn the lower-level APIs, and perform initial testing on the driver, was write a "mirror" drive. The user-mode code pointed to a folder on disk, the driver made a virtual disk drive, and all reads and writes in the virtual disk drive went to the mirror folder. On Windows, you can implement something like that... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Possible to use VeraCrypt without OSXFuse
    "FUSE-T is a kext-less implementation of FUSE for macOS that uses NFS v4 local server instead of a kernel extension. The main motivation for this project is to replace macfuse (https://osxfuse.github.io/) that implements its own kext to make fuse work. With each version of macOS it's getting harder and harder to load kernel extensions. Apple strongly discourages it and, for this reason, software distributions... Source: about 2 years ago
  • mount harddisk with different formats
    Macos doesn’t support many Linux file system formats. You’ll have to use something like macFUSE https://osxfuse.github.io/. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

NetApp HCI mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of NetApp HCI yet. Tracking of NetApp HCI recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OSXFUSE and NetApp HCI, you can also consider the following products

Tuxera NTFS for Mac - Microsoft NTFS for Mac by Tuxera brings reliable read-write compatibility for all NTFS-formatted USB drives on your Mac. Try free for 15 days.

VMware vSAN - VMware vSAN is radically simple, enterprise-class software-defined storage powering VMware hyper-converged infrastructure. 

Mounty for NTFS - A tiny tool to re-mount write-protected NTFS volumes under Mac OS X 10.9+ in read-write mode.

Nutanix - Nutanix is a virtualized datacenter platform that provides disruptive datacenter infrastructure solutions for implementing enterprise-class.

Paragon ExtFS - Provides MacOS and Windows machines native access to the Linux OS ext file system family.

HPE SimpliVity - Simplify your IT with HPE Simplivity hyper converged infrastructure, your all-in one management solution for hybrid cloud and VM efficiency, scalability.