Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

OSXFUSE VS LizardFS

Compare OSXFUSE VS LizardFS and see what are their differences

Bunny.net
BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

OSXFUSE logo OSXFUSE

FUSE for OS X allows you to extend OS X's native file handling capabilities via third-party...

LizardFS logo LizardFS

LizardFS is a distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant and highly available file system.
  • OSXFUSE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-15
  • LizardFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-19

OSXFUSE videos

+ Add

Apple: OSXFuse & VeraCrypt on Big Sur: OSXFuse seems to be missing on your machine (2 Solutions!!)

LizardFS videos

+ Add

A look at MooseFS and LizardFS distributed file systems

More videos:

  • Review - LizardFS Intro
  • Tutorial - LizardFS and OpenNebula, a petabyte cloud the simple way How to move OpenNebula into the Petabyte s…

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OSXFUSE and LizardFS)

OSXFUSE

LizardFS

Cloud Storage
58 58%
Cloud Storage
42% 42
Storage
53 53%
Storage
47% 47
OS & Utilities
100 100%
OS & Utilities
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
Cloud Computing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OSXFUSE and LizardFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare OSXFUSE and LizardFS

OSXFUSE Reviews

We have no reviews of OSXFUSE yet.
Be the first one to post

LizardFS Reviews

Ceph Storage Platform Alternatives in 2022
LizardFS, Software Defined Storage is a distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant, and highly available file system. It allows combining disk space located on several servers into a single namespace visible on Unix-like and Windows systems in the same way as other file systems. LizardFS was inspired by the GoogleFS distributed file system that was introduced in 2010.
Source: www.teimouri.net

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OSXFUSE seems to be a lot more popular than LizardFS. While we know about 31 links to OSXFUSE, we've tracked only 1 mention of LizardFS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OSXFUSE mentions (31)

  • Please someone save me from file sharing hell to windows
    I didn't exactly use any 'tutorial'. Assumming you can already SSH to the target machine, you just need to install both these pkgs then reboot to 1TR Recovery Mode and choosing Reduced Security and choose to enable Kernel Extension and then reboot again goto Security & Privacy and Allow the extension, and that's it you can now use it. Source: 5 months ago
  • How do I fix this?
    Weird. Where did you download (lat/new)est MacFuse from? https://osxfuse.github.io/ I hope! Source: 10 months ago
  • Ask HN: What are some good resources for learning about low level disk/file IO?
    I lead a project that included shipping a filesystem driver and a virtual disk on Windows. What I did to learn the lower-level APIs, and perform initial testing on the driver, was write a "mirror" drive. The user-mode code pointed to a folder on disk, the driver made a virtual disk drive, and all reads and writes in the virtual disk drive went to the mirror folder. On Windows, you can implement something like that... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Possible to use VeraCrypt without OSXFuse
    "FUSE-T is a kext-less implementation of FUSE for macOS that uses NFS v4 local server instead of a kernel extension. The main motivation for this project is to replace macfuse (https://osxfuse.github.io/) that implements its own kext to make fuse work. With each version of macOS it's getting harder and harder to load kernel extensions. Apple strongly discourages it and, for this reason, software distributions... Source: about 1 year ago
  • mount harddisk with different formats
    Macos doesn’t support many Linux file system formats. You’ll have to use something like macFUSE https://osxfuse.github.io/. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

LizardFS mentions (1)

  • Had to add a second sata card and upgrade to a 1600 watt power supply because spinning up 17 drives was too much for my poor 900 watt...
    That's a lotta eggs to put in one basket. I started using LizardFS for mass storage and it basically allows me to grow/shrink easily. https://lizardfs.com/. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OSXFUSE and LizardFS, you can also consider the following products

Tuxera NTFS for Mac - Microsoft NTFS for Mac by Tuxera brings reliable read-write compatibility for all NTFS-formatted USB drives on your Mac. Try free for 15 days.

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Mounty for NTFS - A tiny tool to re-mount write-protected NTFS volumes under Mac OS X 10.9+ in read-write mode.

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Dokan - User mode file system library for windows with FUSE Wrapper

BeeGFS -   Download What is BeeGFS? BeeGFS (formerly FhGFS) is a parallel cluster file system, developed with a strong focus on performance and designed for very easy installation and management.

Loading...