Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OSXFUSE VS Ext2 Installable File System

Compare OSXFUSE VS Ext2 Installable File System and see what are their differences

OSXFUSE logo OSXFUSE

FUSE for OS X allows you to extend OS X's native file handling capabilities via third-party...

Ext2 Installable File System logo Ext2 Installable File System

It provides Windows NT4.
  • OSXFUSE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-15
  • Ext2 Installable File System Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-17

OSXFUSE features and specs

  • User Space File Systems
    OSXFUSE allows the creation of fully functional file systems in user space. This facilitates development by not requiring changes to kernel code, reducing the risk of affecting system stability.
  • Flexibility
    Developers can implement a wide variety of file systems with different abstractions and benefits, tailored for specific tasks or unique applications.
  • Wide Range of Use Cases
    OSXFUSE supports various applications, from cloud storage solutions and encrypted file systems to unique file abstractions, making it versatile for different needs.
  • Community Support
    Being open-source, OSXFUSE benefits from community contributions, documentation, and shared implementations that can aid development and problem-solving.
  • Cross-Platform Development
    OSXFUSE's similarity to FUSE on other Unix-like systems simplifies cross-platform development and porting of file systems.

Possible disadvantages of OSXFUSE

  • Performance Overhead
    Running file system operations in user space can introduce additional latency compared to kernel-based file systems, potentially affecting performance.
  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring OSXFUSE and its corresponding file systems might be challenging, especially for users not familiar with terminal commands or file system concepts.
  • Security Concerns
    User space file systems could introduce security vulnerabilities if not implemented carefully, as bugs can lead to data corruption or unauthorized access.
  • Limited Kernel Integration
    Since OSXFUSE operates in user space, it may not have the same deep integration and performance optimizations available to in-kernel file systems.

Ext2 Installable File System features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Ext2 Installable File System allows Windows operating systems to read and write to Ext2 file systems, bridging the gap between Linux and Windows platforms.
  • Performance
    Ext2 does not have journaling, which can result in faster performance compared to Ext3 or Ext4 under certain circumstances, particularly on older hardware.
  • Simplicity
    The Ext2 file system is simpler than Ext3 and Ext4, which can make it easier to understand and use for certain applications.
  • Free and Open-Source
    Ext2 Installable File System is open-source software, allowing users to view, modify, and distribute the code as needed.

Possible disadvantages of Ext2 Installable File System

  • Lack of Journaling
    The absence of journaling in Ext2 increases the risk of data loss in the event of system crashes or power failures, as it does not keep a log of changes to the file system.
  • Limited Features
    Ext2 lacks modern features found in newer file systems, such as file permissions and security enhancements, reducing its suitability for environments requiring advanced file system features.
  • Data Inconsistency Risks
    Without journaling, Ext2 is more prone to file system corruption, requiring more frequent checks and repairs during improper shutdowns.
  • Deprecated
    Ext2 is an older file system and is not actively developed like Ext3 or Ext4, potentially lacking updates and improvements found in newer systems.

OSXFUSE videos

Apple: OSXFuse & VeraCrypt on Big Sur: OSXFuse seems to be missing on your machine (2 Solutions!!)

Ext2 Installable File System videos

No Ext2 Installable File System videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OSXFUSE and Ext2 Installable File System)
Cloud Storage
80 80%
20% 20
Storage
88 88%
12% 12
CD Image Creator
44 44%
56% 56
OS & Utilities
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using OSXFUSE and Ext2 Installable File System. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OSXFUSE seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 31 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OSXFUSE mentions (31)

  • Please someone save me from file sharing hell to windows
    I didn't exactly use any 'tutorial'. Assumming you can already SSH to the target machine, you just need to install both these pkgs then reboot to 1TR Recovery Mode and choosing Reduced Security and choose to enable Kernel Extension and then reboot again goto Security & Privacy and Allow the extension, and that's it you can now use it. Source: over 1 year ago
  • How do I fix this?
    Weird. Where did you download (lat/new)est MacFuse from? https://osxfuse.github.io/ I hope! Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What are some good resources for learning about low level disk/file IO?
    I lead a project that included shipping a filesystem driver and a virtual disk on Windows. What I did to learn the lower-level APIs, and perform initial testing on the driver, was write a "mirror" drive. The user-mode code pointed to a folder on disk, the driver made a virtual disk drive, and all reads and writes in the virtual disk drive went to the mirror folder. On Windows, you can implement something like that... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Possible to use VeraCrypt without OSXFuse
    "FUSE-T is a kext-less implementation of FUSE for macOS that uses NFS v4 local server instead of a kernel extension. The main motivation for this project is to replace macfuse (https://osxfuse.github.io/) that implements its own kext to make fuse work. With each version of macOS it's getting harder and harder to load kernel extensions. Apple strongly discourages it and, for this reason, software distributions... Source: about 2 years ago
  • mount harddisk with different formats
    Macos doesn’t support many Linux file system formats. You’ll have to use something like macFUSE https://osxfuse.github.io/. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Ext2 Installable File System mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Ext2 Installable File System yet. Tracking of Ext2 Installable File System recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OSXFUSE and Ext2 Installable File System, you can also consider the following products

Tuxera NTFS for Mac - Microsoft NTFS for Mac by Tuxera brings reliable read-write compatibility for all NTFS-formatted USB drives on your Mac. Try free for 15 days.

Linux File Systems for Windows - Plug hard disk with ExtFS/Btrfs/XFS partitions and work with media on Windows.

Mounty for NTFS - A tiny tool to re-mount write-protected NTFS volumes under Mac OS X 10.9+ in read-write mode.

DiskInternals Linux Reader - A freeware tool for extracting files from Ext2/Ext3/Ext4, hfs and ReiserFS partitions in Windows

iBoysoft NTFS for Mac - Free download iBoysoft NTFS for Mac to read, write, mount, format NTFS drives on Mac and transfer files to NTFS drives on macOS Sonoma, macOS Ventura, macOS Monterey, macOS Big Sur, macOS Catalina, macOS Mojave, and macOS High Sierra.

Ext2Read (Ext2Explore) - Ext2Read is an explorer like utility to explore ext2/ext3/ext4 files. It now supports Linux LVM2.