Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Open Access Button VS Arxiv Sanity Preserver

Compare Open Access Button VS Arxiv Sanity Preserver and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Open Access Button logo Open Access Button

Find free research & help make more of it publicly available

Arxiv Sanity Preserver logo Arxiv Sanity Preserver

Recommends and filters arxiv papers.
  • Open Access Button Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-22
  • Arxiv Sanity Preserver Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-12

Open Access Button features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Arxiv Sanity Preserver features and specs

  • Accessible Interface
    Arxiv Sanity Preserver offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the navigation and exploration of academic papers. This can be particularly beneficial for researchers who are looking for a smoother browsing experience compared to using the traditional arXiv website.
  • Personalized Recommendations
    The platform provides personalized paper recommendations based on the user's saved papers and search history, which helps researchers discover relevant work without sifting through unrelated papers.
  • Efficient Search
    With improved search capabilities and filtering options, users can quickly find papers that are pertinent to their needs, enhancing productivity and reducing the time spent on research.
  • Community Insights
    The inclusion of community-driven features like paper discussion threads can provide additional insights and context, enriching the understanding of the content beyond what a paper alone offers.

Possible disadvantages of Arxiv Sanity Preserver

  • Limited Dataset
    Arxiv Sanity Preserver primarily focuses on papers available on arXiv, which may exclude research from other sources. Users relying solely on this tool might miss out on broader academic work published elsewhere.
  • Dependence on User Activity
    While personalized recommendations can be an advantage, they also depend heavily on consistent and specific user activity to be accurate. New or less active users might receive less relevant suggestions.
  • Potential Over-Reliance
    Relying heavily on the tool's algorithms and recommendations might lead users to miss out on serendipitous discoveries that occur through traditional, less filtered research methods.
  • Scalability Issues
    There may be scalability challenges as the platform attempts to keep up with the rapidly growing volume of new entries on arXiv, which could impact the tool's performance or comprehensiveness over time.

Open Access Button videos

Open Access Button

More videos:

  • Review - Open Access Button JISC 2015 Video

Arxiv Sanity Preserver videos

No Arxiv Sanity Preserver videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Open Access Button and Arxiv Sanity Preserver)
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Research Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Education
66 66%
34% 34
Information Organization
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Open Access Button and Arxiv Sanity Preserver. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Open Access Button might be a bit more popular than Arxiv Sanity Preserver. We know about 10 links to it since March 2021 and only 8 links to Arxiv Sanity Preserver. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Open Access Button mentions (10)

  • ‘Too greedy’: mass walkout at global science journal over ‘unethical’ fees - Entire board resigns over actions of academic publisher whose profit margins outstrip even Google and Amazon
    Try instead openaccessbutton.org or e-mail authors directly. Source: about 2 years ago
  • is there anyway I can avoid paying 50$ for research papers?
    You may also want to check out the Open Access Button. https://openaccessbutton.org/. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Why do Chinese/Asian wheat noodles taste/feel different than Italian/European wheat pasta?
    There are browser add-ons that can help with the same, such as the OA button or Unpaywall, though Google Scholar is slightly better (for now) given that they cast a wider net. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Sci-Hub Scholar - Firefox Extension Update v1.2.0
    I've seen some other Sci-Hub extensions, most notably https://openaccessbutton.org/. However most of these require you to go to the article page, then click the extension's button to finally be redirected. I thought I could do better. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Best way for someone unafilliated with a university to get access to a swath of academic journals (in this case medicine/neurology)?
    Have you tried open access button for individual articles? It's not perfect and can be really hit-or-miss, but if there's a (legal!) free version out there, it's pretty good at finding it. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Arxiv Sanity Preserver mentions (8)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Open Access Button and Arxiv Sanity Preserver, you can also consider the following products

Unpaywall - Legally read research papers behind paywalls.

Google Scholar - Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...

filtr.pub - Find high-quality AI research easily

SemanticScholar - An academic search engine that utilizes artificial intelligence methods to provide highly relevant results and novel tools to filter them with ease.

SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers

BioSeek Mobile - BioSeek Mobile - Next Generation Search For Life Sciences. Fast. Efficient. Free. We process at one go multi-component searches that are normally quite time consuming. We strive to deliver the clearest representations of massive amounts of data.