Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OCaml VS Elm

Compare OCaml VS Elm and see what are their differences

OCaml logo OCaml

(* Binary tree with leaves carrying an integer.

Elm logo Elm

A type inferred, functional reactive language that compiles to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript
  • OCaml Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

We recommend LibHunt OCaml for discovery and comparisons of trending OCaml projects.

  • Elm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-23

We recommend LibHunt Elm for discovery and comparisons of trending Elm projects.

OCaml features and specs

  • Strong Type System
    OCaml's type system is robust and supports type inference, which helps catch errors at compile time and increases code maintainability.
  • Functional Programming Features
    OCaml provides strong support for functional programming paradigms, which can lead to more concise and expressive code.
  • Performance
    OCaml compiles to native code, making it suitable for performance-critical applications while retaining the high-level language benefits.
  • Interactive Top-Level
    OCaml provides an interactive top-level or REPL (Read-Evaluate-Print Loop), useful for quickly testing code snippets and prototyping.
  • Pattern Matching
    OCaml's pattern matching is powerful and expressive, allowing for cleaner and more readable code when dealing with complex data structures.

Possible disadvantages of OCaml

  • Steep Learning Curve
    OCaml can be challenging to learn for developers unfamiliar with functional programming or type inference systems.
  • Limited Libraries
    Compared to more popular languages, OCaml has a smaller ecosystem of libraries and tools, which might limit its applicability in some domains.
  • Documentation
    The documentation for OCaml and its libraries can be sparse or insufficient, which can be a barrier for new users.
  • Verbose Syntax
    OCaml syntax can be verbose and may require more boilerplate code compared to some other functional languages.
  • Lack of Parallelism Support
    OCaml's support for parallelism and concurrency is limited compared to some other languages, which could be a disadvantage for highly concurrent applications.

Elm features and specs

  • Strong Type System
    Elm's type system is designed to catch errors at compile-time, reducing runtime errors and improving code reliability. It emphasizes immutability, making it easier to reason about and maintain code.
  • No Runtime Exceptions
    Elm enforces safety with its type system, ensuring that runtime exceptions are almost impossible. This leads to more robust and predictable applications.
  • Friendly Error Messages
    Elm's compiler provides exceptionally helpful and user-friendly error messages, which make debugging easier and learning the language more approachable.
  • Optimized Performance
    Elm's compiler generates highly optimized JavaScript, resulting in fast and efficient applications. Performance tuning is handled by the compiler, freeing developers from many optimization concerns.
  • Functional Programming
    Elm is purely functional, promoting a clear and declarative coding style. It encourages developers to write more predictable and maintainable code by leveraging functional programming principles.
  • Built-In Architecture
    The Elm Architecture (Model-Update-View) provides a consistent pattern for building applications, which can simplify the development process and improve code organization.
  • Interoperability with JavaScript
    Elm allows you to seamlessly integrate with existing JavaScript code through ports, giving you the flexibility to gradually adopt Elm or work with libraries that are not available in Elm.

Possible disadvantages of Elm

  • Small Ecosystem
    Elm's ecosystem is relatively small compared to more established languages like JavaScript or TypeScript, meaning there are fewer libraries and tools available, which might limit certain functionalities out of the box.
  • Learning Curve
    Elm’s functional programming paradigm and strict type system can be challenging for developers who are not familiar with functional programming, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Limited Developer Community
    The Elm community is smaller compared to other languages, which can make finding support or example projects more difficult. This might also affect the availability of tutorials and learning resources.
  • Interoperability Overhead
    While interoperability with JavaScript is possible through ports, it introduces additional complexity and overhead, making integrated projects more challenging to manage.
  • Slower Release Cycle
    Elm's development and release cycle can be slower compared to other technologies. Updates and new features might take longer to be released, impacting the adoption of cutting-edge practices.
  • Single File Approach
    In Elm, managing large codebases can be problematic due to the lack of support for splitting code into multiple modules or files akin to solutions in other languages, which can make the code less modular and harder to navigate.

OCaml videos

Uncommon Languages: OCaml

More videos:

  • Review - What is Ocaml?
  • Review - OCaml – The Best Coding Language for Blockchain – Dr. Dray at Tezos LA

Elm videos

Nightmare on Elm St (series review)

More videos:

  • Review - A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) - Movie Review
  • Review - A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master - Movie Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OCaml and Elm)
Programming Language
41 41%
59% 59
OOP
50 50%
50% 50
Generic Programming Language
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using OCaml and Elm. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Elm should be more popular than OCaml. It has been mentiond 123 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OCaml mentions (32)

  • TypeScript's Lack of Naming Types and Type Conversion in Angular
    Elm, ReScript, F#, Ocaml, Scala… it’s just normal to name your types, then use them places. In fact, you’ll often create the types _before_ the code, even if you’re not really practicing DDD (Domain Driven Design). Yes, you’ll do many after the fact when doing functions, or you start testing things and decide to change your design, and make new types. Either way, it’s just “the norm”. You then do the other norms... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • ReScript has come a long way, maybe it's time to switch from TypeScript?
    Ocaml is still a wonderful language if you want to look into it, and Reason is still going strong as an alternate syntax for OCaml. With either OCaml or Reason you can compile to native code, or use the continuation of BuckleScript now called Melange. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Bringing more sweetness to ruby with sorbet types 🍦
    If you have been in the Ruby community for the past couple of years, it's possible that you're not a super fan of types or that this concept never passed through your mind, and that's totally cool. I myself love the dynamic and meta-programming nature of Ruby, and honestly, by the time of this article's writing, we aren't on the level of OCaml for type checking and inference, but still, there are a couple of nice... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Notes about the ongoing Perl logo discussion
    An amazing example is Ocaml lang logo / mascot. It might be useful to talk with them to know what was the process behind this work. The About page camel head on Perl dot org header is also a pretty good example of simplification, but it's not a logo, just a friendly illustration, as the O'Reilly camel is. Another notable logo for this animal is the well known tobacco industry company, but don't get me started on... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • What can Category Theory do?
    Haskell and Agda are probably the most obvious examples. Ocaml too, but it is much older, so its type system is not as categorical. There is also Idris, which is not as well-known but is very cool. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

Elm mentions (123)

  • 3 Options to Avoid Side-Effects in Web Dev
    Use languages that don’t have side-effects; Elm for UI, and Roc for API/CLI. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Reactivity in Programming
    Reactive programming itself is rarely found in pure form. It is often combined with other paradigms. This is how such mixes as Imperative Reactive Programming, Object-Oriented Reactive Programming and Functional Reactive Programming appeared. The latter is the most popular, and the Elm language is considered one of its main representatives. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Tsonnet #13 - Carets, columns, and clues: adding lexing error tracing
    I've drawn inspiration from Elm and the blog post Compiler Errors for Humans -- it is nearly a decade old and still inspiring to read. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • An Ode to TypeScript Enums
    When I see this it makes me want to run for ReasonML/ReScript/Elm/PureScript. Sum types (without payloads on the instances they are effectively enums) should not require a evening filling ceremonial dance event to define. https://reasonml.github.io/ https://rescript-lang.org/ https://elm-lang.org/ https://www.purescript.org/ (any I forgot?) It's nice that TS is a strict super set of JS... But that's about the only... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • TypeScript's Lack of Naming Types and Type Conversion in Angular
    Elm, ReScript, F#, Ocaml, Scala… it’s just normal to name your types, then use them places. In fact, you’ll often create the types _before_ the code, even if you’re not really practicing DDD (Domain Driven Design). Yes, you’ll do many after the fact when doing functions, or you start testing things and decide to change your design, and make new types. Either way, it’s just “the norm”. You then do the other norms... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OCaml and Elm, you can also consider the following products

Rust - A safe, concurrent, practical language

Elixir - Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications

Poly/ML - The Poly/ML implementation of Standard ML – full multiprocessor support in the thread library and garbage collector, interactive debugger, fast compiler.

Kotlin - Statically typed Programming Language targeting JVM and JavaScript

Clojure - Clojure is a dynamic, general-purpose programming language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming.

NIM - GB64.COM is the home of The Gamebase Collection of C64 games.