Cppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Based on our record, Nuxt.js seems to be a lot more popular than Cppcheck. While we know about 149 links to Nuxt.js, we've tracked only 10 mentions of Cppcheck. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
In recent years, projects like Vercel's NextJS and Gatsby have garnered acclaim and higher and higher usage numbers. Not only that, but their core concepts of Server Side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG) have been seen in other projects and frameworks such as Angular Universal, ScullyIO, and NuxtJS. Why is that? What is SSR and SSG? How can I use these concepts in my applications? - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
One reason to opt for server side rendering is improved SEO, so if this is especially import for your project you could have a look at for instance https://remix.run/ or https://nextjs.org/ for react or https://nuxtjs.org/ if you use Vue. Source: about 2 years ago
Well nuxtjs.org work smooth on ios 12, maybe you didn't understand what I'm talking about. Source: about 2 years ago
E.g. Most nuxtjs.org documentation is Nuxt 2 and therefore Vue 2, while nuxt.com documentation is always Nuxt 3 and therefore Vue 3. Source: about 2 years ago
For detailed explanation on how things work, check out the documentation. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 2 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 2 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 2 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 2 years ago
Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free