Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

nuttcp VS Flent

Compare nuttcp VS Flent and see what are their differences

nuttcp logo nuttcp

nuttcp is another network test tool, similar to iperf2 and iperf3, that has a number of unique features.

Flent logo Flent

The FLExible Network Tester
Not present
  • Flent Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-07

nuttcp videos

No nuttcp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Flent videos

Flent b091 unboxing & review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to nuttcp and Flent)
Monitoring Tools
47 47%
53% 53
Log Management
52 52%
48% 48
Network & Admin
48 48%
52% 52
Network Scanning
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using nuttcp and Flent. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flent seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

nuttcp mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of nuttcp yet. Tracking of nuttcp recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Flent mentions (7)

  • Most accurate internet speed test.
    You should try Flent from the BufferBloat project. Source: 12 months ago
  • Tools for measuring Network convergence, delay and packet loss
    Flent (Flexible Network Tester) is a powerful network testing utility that aims to simplify the process of gathering and analyzing network performance metrics. Built on top of other open-source tools like Netperf, Iperf, and Ping, Flent automates the process of running multiple tests simultaneously and aggregates the results into comprehensive, easy-to-interpret graphs. Flent's ability to run various tests in... Source: about 1 year ago
  • Help eliminating buffer bloat on connection speeds over 1gbps
    Hmm... It does not take much packet loss to slow tcp down at that rate. A better test would run longer than waveform, like the flent.org tcp_ndown test. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Loaded latency with fast.com?
    Also most of our web based tests do not last long enough to show the full extent of the problem. Waveform, while pretty good, doesn't test up and down simultaneously, nor does it last long enough. I've put out a few measurements here or there about what Starlink looks like over time, such as most recently, over here: https://github.com/mininet/mininet/issues/1119 - long term spikes for "Working latency" on... Source: about 2 years ago
  • 6.6 is out
    Install Flent. See the bottom of https://flent.org/ for instructions. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing nuttcp and Flent, you can also consider the following products

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

NetStress - NetStress is a user-friendly benchmarking tool that is mostly used by networking professionals to measure the network performance of both wired and wireless connections.

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

goben - goben is a tool to measure TCP/UDP transport layer throughput between hosts.