Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Nu Shell VS bash-completion

Compare Nu Shell VS bash-completion and see what are their differences

Nu Shell logo Nu Shell

A modern shell written in Rust

bash-completion logo bash-completion

bash-completion: programmable completion for the http://alternativeto.net/software/bash/ shell
  • Nu Shell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21
Not present

Nu Shell features and specs

  • Modern Design
    Nu Shell offers a modern shell environment with structured data support, rather than plain text, making data manipulation more powerful and intuitive.
  • Cross-Platform
    Nu Shell is designed to work across different operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, enhancing versatility and interoperability.
  • Enhanced Pipelines
    Its pipelines are more advanced because they pass structured data rather than text, allowing better automation and complex data transformations.
  • Rich Plugin Support
    Nu Shell supports custom plugins, which expands its functionalities and allows users to tailor the shell to their specific needs.
  • User-Friendly
    With a focus on user experience, Nu Shell provides features like autocomplete, syntax highlighting, and inline help, which make it easier for new users to adopt.

Possible disadvantages of Nu Shell

  • Learning Curve
    Users accustomed to traditional shells may find Nu Shell's approach to data and commands different, requiring time and effort to learn.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Since Nu Shell handles data differently, scripts and tools that rely on traditional shell behavior may not work without modification.
  • Limited Adoption
    Nu Shell is relatively new and has a smaller user community compared to established shells like bash or zsh, which can impact community support and available resources.
  • Performance Overhead
    The structured data approach, while powerful, can add performance overhead compared to simpler traditional shell operations, especially in high-demand scripting.
  • Documentation Gaps
    As with many evolving projects, there might be gaps or inconsistencies in documentation, which can make troubleshooting and learning more difficult for new users.

bash-completion features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Nu Shell and bash-completion)
Cryptocurrencies
90 90%
10% 10
Blockchain
94 94%
6% 6
Uptime Monitoring
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Nu Shell and bash-completion. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Nu Shell seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 41 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Nu Shell mentions (41)

View more

bash-completion mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of bash-completion yet. Tracking of bash-completion recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Nu Shell and bash-completion, you can also consider the following products

fish shell - The friendly interactive shell.

sash - a stand-alone shell with many built-in commands.

the xonsh shell - Xonsh is a Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell language and command prompt.

win-bash - win-bash is a Windows port of the famous GNU bash (see GNU Bash homepage).

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

GNU Bourne Again SHell - Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.