NSQ
ZeroMQ
RabbitMQ
nanomsg
Apache Kafka
Apache ActiveMQ
ubus
D-Bus
Sidekiq
Hangfire
Resque
delayed_job
Enqueue It
RabbitMQ
Apache Kafka
Amazon SQS
SidekiqBased on our record, Sidekiq should be more popular than NSQ. It has been mentiond 20 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
(G)NATS can do millions of messages per second and is the right tool for the job (either that or NSQ). Redis isn't even the fastest Redis protocol implementation, KeyDB significantly outperforms it. Source: about 1 year ago
Bit.ly's NSQ is also an excellent message queue option. Source: about 1 year ago
Queue consumers are interesting because there are many solutions for them, from using Redis and persisting the data in a data store - but for fast and scalable the approach I would take is something like SQS (as I advocate AWS even free tier) or NSQ for managing your own distributed producers and consumers. Source: over 1 year ago
Distrubition server engine ( for example websocket server multi ws gateway and worker pool,nsq.io realtime message queue and so on). Source: almost 2 years ago
NSQ is a message queue implemented by Golang, and all messages are routed through NSQ. Reasons for choosing NSQ compared to other MQs: decentralized distribution (direct connection between production and consumption), low latency, No ordering, high performance, simple binary protocol. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Sidekiq https://sidekiq.org/: This one started as an open source project, once it got enough traction, the developer made a premium version of it, and makes money by selling licenses to businesses. Source: 5 months ago
> I'm not sure feature withholding has traditionally worked out well in the developer space. I think it's worked out well for Sidekiq (https://sidekiq.org). I really like their model of layering valuable features between the OSS / Pro / Enterprise licenses. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
The code above isn't idempotent. If you run it twice, it will create two copies, which is probably not what you intended. Why is this important? Because most backend job processors like Sidekiq don't make any guarantees that your jobs will run exactly once. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Relevant Patio11 comment from 2016: > We don't donate to OSS software which we use, because we're legally not allowed to. > I routinely send key projects, particularly smaller projects, a request to quote me a commercial license of their project, with the explanation that I would accept a quote of $1,000 and that the commercial license can be their existing OSS license plus an invoice. My books suggest we've spent... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
So how do we trigger such a long-running process from a Rails request? The first option that comes to mind is a background job run by some of the queuing back-ends such as Sidekiq, Resque or DelayedJob, possibly governed by ActiveJob. While this would surely work, the problem with all these solutions is that they usually have a limited number of workers available on the server and we didn’t want to potentially... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library.
Hangfire - An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.
RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.
Resque - Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.
nanomsg - nanomsg is a socket library that provides several common communication patterns.
delayed_job - Database based asynchronous priority queue system -- Extracted from Shopify - collectiveidea/delayed_job