Software Alternatives & Reviews

NSQ VS Hangfire

Compare NSQ VS Hangfire and see what are their differences

NSQ logo NSQ

A realtime distributed messaging platform.

Hangfire logo Hangfire

An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.
  • NSQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-07
  • Hangfire Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04

NSQ videos

GopherCon 2014 Spray Some NSQ On It by Matt Reiferson

More videos:

Hangfire videos

AK 47 Wasr Hangfire - shooter beware

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NSQ and Hangfire)
Stream Processing
51 51%
49% 49
Data Integration
46 46%
54% 54
Web Service Automation
44 44%
56% 56
ETL
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using NSQ and Hangfire. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NSQ and Hangfire

NSQ Reviews

NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
NSQ is designed with a distributed architecture around the concept of topics, which allows messages to be organized and distributed across the cluster. To ensure reliable delivery, NSQ replicates each message across multiple nodes within the NSQ cluster. This means that if a node fails or there’s a disruption in the network, the message can still be delivered to its intended...
Source: gcore.com

Hangfire Reviews

We have no reviews of Hangfire yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

NSQ might be a bit more popular than Hangfire. We know about 7 links to it since March 2021 and only 5 links to Hangfire. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NSQ mentions (7)

  • Any thoughts on using Redis to extend Go's channels across application / machine boundaries?
    (G)NATS can do millions of messages per second and is the right tool for the job (either that or NSQ). Redis isn't even the fastest Redis protocol implementation, KeyDB significantly outperforms it. Source: about 1 year ago
  • FileWave: Why we moved from ZeroMQ to NATS
    Bit.ly's NSQ is also an excellent message queue option. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Infinite loop pattern to poll for a queue in a REST server app
    Queue consumers are interesting because there are many solutions for them, from using Redis and persisting the data in a data store - but for fast and scalable the approach I would take is something like SQS (as I advocate AWS even free tier) or NSQ for managing your own distributed producers and consumers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • What are pros and cons of Go?
    Distrubition server engine ( for example websocket server multi ws gateway and worker pool,nsq.io realtime message queue and so on). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Distributed IM Service in Golang
    NSQ is a message queue implemented by Golang, and all messages are routed through NSQ. Reasons for choosing NSQ compared to other MQs: decentralized distribution (direct connection between production and consumption), low latency, No ordering, high performance, simple binary protocol. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

Hangfire mentions (5)

  • Do I need message queues for sending emails/texts via services like SendGrid, AWS SES, Twilio etc.? How do you decide if you need message queues or not? What questions do you ask yourself?
    Hangfire (https://hangfire.io) includes default exception handling and is very extensible, I think it's a good mid-level choice and a good alternative to other queue mechanism, if you can't afford to host a separated queue service or can't manage a separated service; also scales pretty well (you can have multiple servers handling the same background job queue, or different queues). It runs on Sql Server and MySql... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • jsonb in postgres and should I use it or not?
    I used to just use hangfire.io in .net and worked wonderfully for any long running tasks or schedules. Had a great queuing system, UI to know if they failed , etc. That's how I'd send emails, pdf's, and other things along that nature. Then if it were more just a db related operation, just setup a schedule in mssql job service. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How can In make a function run at a certain date in the future?
    You can use hangfire for cronjob, to run at a time in future, you can use Hangfire.Schedule(jobid, datetime). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to handle processing of an entity through different states?
    So another option is to use something like https://hangfire.io to pull the jobs and process them? Source: about 2 years ago
  • How to update database in a Parallel.For loop?
    I've got a fairly large process I need to handle in background on my .net core web app so I've exported it to a background task using Hangfire. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NSQ and Hangfire, you can also consider the following products

ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library.

Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Enqueue It - Easy and scalable solution for manage and execute background tasks seamlessly in .NET applications. It allows you to schedule, queue, and process your jobs and microservices efficiently.

nanomsg - nanomsg is a socket library that provides several common communication patterns.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.