Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Nimbella VS react-testing-library

Compare Nimbella VS react-testing-library and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Nimbella logo Nimbella

Simple serverless cloud for developers

react-testing-library logo react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding
  • Nimbella Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-28
  • react-testing-library Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-21

Nimbella features and specs

  • Serverless Architecture
    Nimbella provides a serverless platform that enables developers to build and deploy applications without managing server infrastructure, allowing for scalable and optimized resource usage.
  • Multi-cloud Support
    The platform supports deployment across different cloud providers, providing flexibility and reducing vendor lock-in for applications.
  • Integrated Developer Experience
    Nimbella offers tools and features that enhance the developer experience, such as built-in CLI tools, debugging, and monitoring capabilities.
  • Event-driven Model
    Supports event-driven programming paradigms, helping developers build reactive applications that can efficiently handle various triggers and events.
  • Seamless CI/CD Integration
    Facilitates continuous integration and deployment through integrations with popular CI/CD tools, streamlining application development and updates.

Possible disadvantages of Nimbella

  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a learning curve when adapting to the serverless architecture and Nimbella's specific tools and workflows.
  • Limited Customization
    Serverless solutions like Nimbella may offer less control over infrastructure and server configurations compared to traditional hosting solutions.
  • Cold Start Latency
    Like other serverless platforms, Nimbella might experience latency during the 'cold start' period when functions are invoked after being inactive.
  • Cost Management Complexity
    While serverless can reduce costs, it requires monitoring and adjustment to prevent unexpected expenses, especially with unpredictable workloads.
  • Vendor Ecosystem Dependence
    Users planning to fully leverage Nimbella might find themselves reliant on its specific ecosystem and offerings, which could impact flexibility and extensibility.

react-testing-library features and specs

  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages of react-testing-library

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

Analysis of react-testing-library

Overall verdict

  • React Testing Library is highly regarded in the React community for its simplicity and effective approach to testing React components. It’s known for promoting good testing practices that result in reliable and maintainable code.

Why this product is good

  • React Testing Library is considered good because it encourages testing practices that closely resemble how users interact with the application. It emphasizes testing components from the user's perspective and discourages testing implementation details, which can lead to more robust and maintainable tests.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to improve the reliability of their React applications
  • Teams interested in adopting user-centric testing methodologies
  • Projects that prioritize maintainable and understandable test code

Nimbella videos

+ Add

Easily Create and Manage Your Custom Slack Commands with Nimbella Commander

More videos:

  • Review - DOP 65: Serverless Made Easy With Nimbella
  • Review - IBM Webinar with Nimbella

react-testing-library videos

+ Add

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos:

  • Review - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Nimbella and react-testing-library)

Nimbella

react-testing-library

Developer Tools
40 40%
Developer Tools
60% 60
Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
Automated Testing
100% 100
DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Nimbella and react-testing-library. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, react-testing-library seems to be a lot more popular than Nimbella. While we know about 133 links to react-testing-library, we've tracked only 1 mention of Nimbella. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Nimbella mentions (1)

  • Kubernetes in simple words: explained by Eric Swildens
    To ease the development of Kubernetes we offer Nimbella serverless platform that is available on prem, private, hybrid, and public cloud. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

react-testing-library mentions (133)

  • Migrating from AngularJS to React
    Additionally, I wrote Jest and Enzyme unit tests to demonstrate how to go about unit testing the components, as test driven development (TDD) is another methodology my organization subscribes to. Jest is a unit testing framework that actually shipped with React if you use the Create React App CLI to make a new React project. And at the time, Enzyme was created by Airbnb and added additional functionality to Jest... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How To Convert HTML CSS JS To React JS
    After converting your components, take some time to test your application. Make sure everything is working as expected. React’s development server automatically reloads your application whenever you save changes, which makes testing a lot easier. Tools like Jest and React Testing Library are also available to help you write tests for your components. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How To Write Unit Test Cases In React JS
    React Testing Library: For testing React components from a user’s point of view, visit the React Testing Library documentation. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Top 20 Modern React Libraries To Supercharge Your Next Big Project
    Resource: React Testing Library Documentation. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Next.js Testing Guide: Unit and E2E Tests with Vitest & Playwright
    In this article, you will write unit tests in Next.js client components and synchronous server components using Vitest and React Testing Library, and you will write end-to-end tests for your async server components using Playwright. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Nimbella and react-testing-library, you can also consider the following products

Serverless - Toolkit for building serverless applications

Jest - Jest is a delightful JavaScript Testing Framework with a focus on simplicity.

Up by apex - Deploy serverless apps and APIs in seconds to AWS Lambda

Enzyme - Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility for React.

Webiny - The Enterprise CMS platform that you can host on your cloud

Vitest - A blazing fast unit test framework powered by Vite

Loading...