Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Nim (programming language) VS Steel Bank Common Lisp

Compare Nim (programming language) VS Steel Bank Common Lisp and see what are their differences

Nim (programming language) logo Nim (programming language)

The Nim programming language is a concise, fast programming language that compiles to C, C++ and JavaScript.

Steel Bank Common Lisp logo Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.
  • Nim (programming language) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-31
  • Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-24

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Nim (programming language) and Steel Bank Common Lisp)
Programming Language
82 82%
18% 18
Generic Programming Language
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
OOP
80 80%
20% 20

User comments

Share your experience with using Nim (programming language) and Steel Bank Common Lisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Nim (programming language) seems to be a lot more popular than Steel Bank Common Lisp. While we know about 142 links to Nim (programming language), we've tracked only 5 mentions of Steel Bank Common Lisp. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Nim (programming language) mentions (142)

  • 3 years of fulltime Rust game development, and why we're leaving Rust behind
    I'd be interested to hear the author's take on Nim [1], which seems to be better suited for game development than Rust by staying out of the dev's way [2], and supports hot-reloading (at least in Unreal Engine 5) [3]? [1] https://nim-lang.org/ [2] https://youtu.be/d2VRuZo2pdA?si=E3N62oUJ-clXozCg [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cdr4-cOsAWA. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • "14 Years of Go" by Rob Pike
    I think the right answer to your question would be NimLang[0]. In reality, if you're seeking to use this in any enterprise context, you'd most likely want to select the subset of C++ that makes sense for you or just use C#. [0]https://nim-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Ask HN: Interest in a Rust-Inspired Language Compiling to JavaScript?
    I don't think it's a rust-inspired language, but since it has strong typing and compiles to javascript, did you give a look at nim [0] ? For what it takes, I find the language very expressive without the verbosity in rust that reminds me java. And it is also very flexible. [0] : https://nim-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Nim
    FYI, on the front page, https://nim-lang.org, in large type you have this: > Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Things I've learned about building CLI tools in Python
    You better off with using a compiled language. If you interested in a language that's compiled, fast, but as easy and pleasant as Python - I'd recommend you take a look at [Nim](https://nim-lang.org). And to prove what Nim's capable of - here's a cool repo with 100+ cli apps someone wrote in Nim: [c-blake/bu](https://github.com/c-blake/bu). - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
View more

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

  • Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed
    Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • A few newbie questions about lisp
    Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: about 1 year ago
  • [C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)
    That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
    I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
    > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Nim (programming language) and Steel Bank Common Lisp, you can also consider the following products

Crystal (programming language) - Programming language with Ruby-like syntax that compiles to efficient native code.

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

V (programming language) - Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software.

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

D (Programming Language) - D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.