Software Alternatives & Reviews

Steel Bank Common Lisp VS V (programming language)

Compare Steel Bank Common Lisp VS V (programming language) and see what are their differences

Steel Bank Common Lisp logo Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

V (programming language) logo V (programming language)

Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software.
  • Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-24
  • V (programming language) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-25

Steel Bank Common Lisp videos

No Steel Bank Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

V (programming language) videos

V Programming Language (Vlang): First Impression - Mike Shah

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to V and its features (Sydney Computing Society)
  • Review - Testing the NEW "V" programming language!
  • Demo - Presentation of Vlang at IBM
  • Review - An introduction to V (Vlang)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Steel Bank Common Lisp and V (programming language))
Programming Language
29 29%
71% 71
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
OOP
23 23%
77% 77
Generic Programming Language

User comments

Share your experience with using Steel Bank Common Lisp and V (programming language). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, V (programming language) seems to be a lot more popular than Steel Bank Common Lisp. While we know about 66 links to V (programming language), we've tracked only 5 mentions of Steel Bank Common Lisp. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

  • Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed
    Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • A few newbie questions about lisp
    Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: 12 months ago
  • [C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)
    That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
    I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
    > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

V (programming language) mentions (66)

  • V Language Review (2023)
    The creator of V made some big claims that raised a few eyeballs, they've gained a reasonable following over the years, have a pretty serious looking website (https://vlang.io) a beer-money level Patreon following and some corporate partnerships/sponsors. However have experienced some pretty brutal takedowns over the years, with some of the bolder claims about the language/compiler being exposed as being. A word I... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Things I've learned about building CLI tools in Python
    Fingers crossed for vlang[0]. It's like golang with better types and more syntactic sugar. Feels like a proper upgrade from Python. I really hope they succeed. [0]: https://vlang.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Ah, Go, with its simple and straightforward syntax, where things just make sense (most of the time, before generics were added)
    And again a No true Scotsman. If that's the kind of attitude you have towards languages, you'll appreciate V infinitely more than you might be appreciating Rust. After all, it offers better solutions than Rust, like autofree, they just aren't there yet :). Source: 10 months ago
  • Why is Vlang's autofree model not more widely used?
    I discovered VLang today. It's an interesting project. Source: 10 months ago
  • Seed7 version 2023-05-29 released on GitHub and SF
    According to their own benchmarks, Seed7 can run faster than C (it compiles to C, but it's entirely possible the emited code is better optimized than a human could write directly in C)... It doesn't have a GC BUT manages memory automatically (I didn't really follow the explanation in the FAQ, something about automatically freeing variables that go out of scope and keeping only one reference around?)... that's like... Source: 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Steel Bank Common Lisp and V (programming language), you can also consider the following products

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

Nim (programming language) - The Nim programming language is a concise, fast programming language that compiles to C, C++ and JavaScript.

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

D (Programming Language) - D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.

Crystal (programming language) - Programming language with Ruby-like syntax that compiles to efficient native code.