Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Neumorphic Generator VS Three.js

Compare Neumorphic Generator VS Three.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Neumorphic Generator logo Neumorphic Generator

Delightful CSS presets for your next product

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.
  • Neumorphic Generator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-06-21
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05

Neumorphic Generator features and specs

  • Visually Appealing Design
    Neumorphic Generator creates a soft, tactile aesthetic for UI components that is visually appealing and modern, making interfaces look more engaging and immersive.
  • Easy to Use
    The tool provides a user-friendly interface for designing neumorphic components without requiring extensive knowledge of CSS or design software, enabling quick generation of styles.
  • Customizable Outputs
    Users can easily adjust parameters such as color, shadow, and border radius to get the desired neumorphic effect, offering flexibility in design.
  • Efficient Workflow
    By automating the creation of neumorphic styles, the generator helps designers save time in developing consistent UI components for projects.

Possible disadvantages of Neumorphic Generator

  • Limited Design Scope
    Neumorphism might not suit all types of designs, particularly those requiring bold contrasts or accessibility-focused interfaces, limiting its application in certain projects.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Neumorphic designs often suffer from low contrast issues, potentially making them less accessible to users with visual impairments, which requires additional design considerations.
  • Performance Overheads
    The heavy use of shadows and gradients to achieve the neumorphic look can result in more complex CSS styles that may impact loading times and runtime performance on less powerful devices.
  • Trend-dependent
    Neumorphism is style-trend dependent, and what might be visually impressive now could become outdated quickly as design trends evolve.

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

Neumorphic Generator videos

No Neumorphic Generator videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Three.js videos

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Neumorphic Generator and Three.js)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Flowcharts
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Neumorphic Generator and Three.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Neumorphic Generator and Three.js

Neumorphic Generator Reviews

We have no reviews of Neumorphic Generator yet.
Be the first one to post

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be a lot more popular than Neumorphic Generator. While we know about 248 links to Three.js, we've tracked only 1 mention of Neumorphic Generator. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Neumorphic Generator mentions (1)

Three.js mentions (248)

  • React Three Ecosystem
    Note three.js [1] has nothing to do with React out of the box though, this page highlights an atypical way of using three.js through a popular React binding. [1] https://threejs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 days ago
  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Neumorphic Generator and Three.js, you can also consider the following products

Neumorphism UI - Neumorphism inspired UI web components, sections and pages

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Glass UI Generator - CSS generator for glassmorphism

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

Tailwind Box Shadows - A curated list of box shadows for your next web project.

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.