Software Alternatives & Reviews

Nanoc VS Octopress

Compare Nanoc VS Octopress and see what are their differences

Nanoc logo Nanoc

A static-site generator written in Ruby

Octopress logo Octopress

A static blogging framework for hackers, based on Jekyll
  • Nanoc Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-11
  • Octopress Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

Nanoc videos

No Nanoc videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Octopress videos

Octopress Automation

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to install Octopress on Windows

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Nanoc and Octopress)
CMS
34 34%
66% 66
Blogging
35 35%
65% 65
Blogging Platform
43 43%
57% 57
Social & Communications
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Nanoc and Octopress. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Nanoc should be more popular than Octopress. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Nanoc mentions (4)

  • The Open Source Story - Open Sourcing RudderStack Blog and Docs
    When we decided to open-source our blog and docs, we were spoilt for choices. Today there are multiple well-supported and fully-featured frameworks for open-source content creation. Some of the options that we considered were Ghost, Jekyll, Hugo, Nanoc, and Gatsby. There are even more frameworks beyond these, and each tool has its pros and cons. Which one do we recommend? Well, we don’t. The best tool for you is... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • What do you use for public publishing your Zettlekasten?
    My websites use a static site generator, that means I have folders of Markdown files and they get converted by this program to HTML. (I'm using nanoc for nearly a decade, but other generators work fine. I like Ruby, so that's why I never tried any of the new JS stuff.) I don't just hit publish on my whole Zettelkasten, but that would work as well if you point your static site generator to your note archive. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Creating a minimalist blog with Jekyll Now
    Last time I was evaluating static site generators, Dimples and Nanoc both stood out for this recent-updates reason, among other personal criteria. https://github.com/waferbaby/dimples https://nanoc.ws/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Something like Github pages but for a wiki?
    I've been looking for something like that for months and now I am pretty confident that such thing does not exist. You can try to bend existing SSG solution to be more wiki-like, but that's all. In that department, I have most success with Zola. But since you asked it in Ruby sub, have a look at Bridgetown or nanoc. Source: about 3 years ago

Octopress mentions (2)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Nanoc and Octopress, you can also consider the following products

Wintersmith - Flexible, minimalistic, multi-platform static site generator built on top of node.js

Blogsvertise - Blogsvertise is an influencer marketing software designed to help businesses discover content creators, collaborate with influencers, and manage marketing campaigns on a centralized platform.

GatsbyJS - Blazing-fast static site generator for React

Winkl - Winkl helps lifestyle bloggers become influencers.

Nikola - Nikola is s static site generator tool written in Python.

DEV.to - Where software engineers connect, build their resumes, and grow.