No Nanoc videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Hugo seems to be a lot more popular than Nanoc. While we know about 354 links to Hugo, we've tracked only 4 mentions of Nanoc. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
When we decided to open-source our blog and docs, we were spoilt for choices. Today there are multiple well-supported and fully-featured frameworks for open-source content creation. Some of the options that we considered were Ghost, Jekyll, Hugo, Nanoc, and Gatsby. There are even more frameworks beyond these, and each tool has its pros and cons. Which one do we recommend? Well, we don’t. The best tool for you is... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
My websites use a static site generator, that means I have folders of Markdown files and they get converted by this program to HTML. (I'm using nanoc for nearly a decade, but other generators work fine. I like Ruby, so that's why I never tried any of the new JS stuff.) I don't just hit publish on my whole Zettelkasten, but that would work as well if you point your static site generator to your note archive. Source: almost 3 years ago
Last time I was evaluating static site generators, Dimples and Nanoc both stood out for this recent-updates reason, among other personal criteria. https://github.com/waferbaby/dimples https://nanoc.ws/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
I've been looking for something like that for months and now I am pretty confident that such thing does not exist. You can try to bend existing SSG solution to be more wiki-like, but that's all. In that department, I have most success with Zola. But since you asked it in Ruby sub, have a look at Bridgetown or nanoc. Source: about 3 years ago
At one point though I realized there is a scaling problem with my build minutes. I knew that golang has considerably faster builds and in my case the easy fix is swapping over to Hugo. - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Hugo is a popular static site generator specifically designed to create websites and documentation lightning-fast. Its minimalist approach, emphasis on speed, and ease of use have made it popular among developers, technical writers, and anybody looking to construct high-quality websites without the complexity of typical CMS platforms. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Wintersmith - Flexible, minimalistic, multi-platform static site generator built on top of node.js
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
GatsbyJS - Blazing-fast static site generator for React
Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.
Nikola - Nikola is s static site generator tool written in Python.
WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.