Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Nacapi VS JsonAPI

Compare Nacapi VS JsonAPI and see what are their differences

Mumble Note
The fastest AI note-taker to capture your scattered thoughts and turn them into organized notes. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Nacapi logo Nacapi

Turn your JSON into a restful API

JsonAPI logo JsonAPI

Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, and Query Languages
  • Nacapi Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-10
  • JsonAPI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-21

Nacapi features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

JsonAPI features and specs

  • Standardization
    JSON:API provides a standardized format for building APIs, which promotes consistency and interoperability between different APIs.
  • Efficiency
    It supports features like sparse fieldsets, compound documents, and included relationships which help in reducing the amount of data transferred and improving response times.
  • Decoupling
    JSON:API encourages a clear separation between client and server, allowing them to evolve independently as long as they adhere to the specification.
  • Error Handling
    It has a well-defined error format that makes it easier for clients to understand what went wrong and how to fix it.
  • Community and Tooling
    A growing community and increasing tooling support make it easier to implement JSON:API in various server-side and client-side technologies.

Possible disadvantages of JsonAPI

  • Complexity
    The specification can be complex and may introduce a learning curve for developers who are new to it or used to simpler REST approaches.
  • Overhead
    Strict adherence to the JSON:API specification can sometimes introduce additional overhead in terms of implementation effort, especially for small projects.
  • Flexibility
    While the standardization is beneficial, it can reduce flexibility in scenarios where a more customized or optimized solution is needed.
  • Adoption
    Although growing, JSON:API is not as widely adopted as other conventions like simple REST, and thus some developers and projects might resist switching to it.
  • Resource Intensive
    Some features of JSON:API, like relationship links and included resources, can become resource-intensive for the server if not implemented carefully.

Nacapi videos

+ Add

Conheça o NaCapital! 🟡🔵

JsonAPI videos

No JsonAPI videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Nacapi and JsonAPI)

Nacapi

JsonAPI

Developer Tools
27 27%
Developer Tools
73% 73
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100
API Tools
19 19%
API Tools
81% 81
Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Nacapi and JsonAPI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JsonAPI seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 49 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Nacapi mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Nacapi yet. Tracking of Nacapi recommendations started around Mar 2021.

JsonAPI mentions (49)

  • OSF API: The Complete Guide
    Built on JSON API standards, the OSF API is intuitive for anyone familiar with REST conventions. Once you learn its core patterns, you can quickly expand into project creation, user collaboration, and more—without constantly referencing documentation. The official OSF API docs provide everything needed to get started. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
  • Common Mistakes in RESTful API Design
    Following established patterns reduces the learning curve for your API. Adopt conventions from JSON:API or Microsoft API Guidelines to provide consistent experiences. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Starting the Console front-end for Rainbow Platform
    I’ve used both GraphQL and REST in the past. From json:api to Relay, each approach for building APIs has its pros and cons. However, a constant challenge is choosing between code-first and schema-first approaches. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • REST API: Best practices and design
    There is a group of people who set out to standardize JSON responses into a single response style, either for returning single or multiple resources. You can take their style as a reference when designing their API to ensure uniformity of responses. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Path To A Clean(er) React Architecture - Domain Entities & DTOs
    The server seems to be using the popular JSON:API standard which is a great way to build APIs. But should we really use these data structures in the frontend? - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Nacapi and JsonAPI, you can also consider the following products

ReqRes - A hosted REST-API ready to respond to your AJAX requests.

Collabinate - Collabinate provides an API for hosted activity streams, allowing your applications to seamlessly include built-in social feeds, microblogging, and collaboration

JSON Placeholder - JSON Placeholder is a modern platform that provides you online REST API, which you can instantly use whenever you need any fake data.

OData - OData, short for Open Data Protocol, is an open protocol to allow the creation and consumption of queryable and interoperable RESTful APIs in a simple and standard way.

jsonbox.io - A free HTTP based JSON Storage.

graphql.js - A reference implementation of GraphQL for JavaScript - graphql/graphql-js

Loading...