Standardization
JSON:API provides a standardized format for building APIs, which promotes consistency and interoperability between different APIs.
Efficiency
It supports features like sparse fieldsets, compound documents, and included relationships which help in reducing the amount of data transferred and improving response times.
Decoupling
JSON:API encourages a clear separation between client and server, allowing them to evolve independently as long as they adhere to the specification.
Error Handling
It has a well-defined error format that makes it easier for clients to understand what went wrong and how to fix it.
Community and Tooling
A growing community and increasing tooling support make it easier to implement JSON:API in various server-side and client-side technologies.
Promote JsonAPI. You can add any of these badges on your website.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if JsonAPI is good.
Check the traffic stats of JsonAPI on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of JsonAPI on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of JsonAPI's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of JsonAPI on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about JsonAPI on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
REST does not define a standard batching mechanism at the protocol level. When batching is needed, it is handled through API design (such as bulk endpoints), infrastructure, or framework-specific solutions. Some specifications attempt to address this, such as ODataโs batch format or JSON:APIโs compound documents, but adoption is inconsistent. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Why reinvent the wheel poorly when you have a hundred of solutions like https://jsonapi.org/? - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
For context, the subject-predicate-object pattern is known as a semantic triple or Resource Description Framework (RDF) triple: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_triple They're useful for storing social network graph data, for example, and can be expressed using standards like Open Graph and JSONAPI: https://ogp.me https://jsonapi.org I've stored RDF triples in database tables and experimented with query... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Built on JSON API standards, the OSF API is intuitive for anyone familiar with REST conventions. Once you learn its core patterns, you can quickly expand into project creation, user collaboration, and moreโwithout constantly referencing documentation. The official OSF API docs provide everything needed to get started. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Following established patterns reduces the learning curve for your API. Adopt conventions from JSON:API or Microsoft API Guidelines to provide consistent experiences. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Iโve used both GraphQL and REST in the past. From json:api to Relay, each approach for building APIs has its pros and cons. However, a constant challenge is choosing between code-first and schema-first approaches. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
There is a group of people who set out to standardize JSON responses into a single response style, either for returning single or multiple resources. You can take their style as a reference when designing their API to ensure uniformity of responses. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
The server seems to be using the popular JSON:API standard which is a great way to build APIs. But should we really use these data structures in the frontend? - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Note: You think the response data structure with the data field and the included field with mixed data types looks weird? You might not have encountered the popular JSON:API standard yet. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
In addition to saving you time on boilerplate, the API provided by Hatchify fully implements the JSON: API specification, which stipulates solid standards to define the peculiarities of CRUD REST APIs. Get back all the time spent bike-shedding how to implement standard API features like filtering, pagination, including related data, etc. JSON: API offers consistent practices for frontend and backend developers to... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
-JSON:API format responses (https://jsonapi.org) for better standardization. Built using Ruby on Rails, Sunnybox is designed to offer a powerful yet easy-to-use solution for developers managing email systems. I'd really appreciate your feedback on: - The API's user-friendliness and efficiency. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
As weโre building a RESTful API thatโs formatted by the JSON:API specification and store our data in a MySQL8 relational database, a few things were pretty straightforward โ we need a new model and weโll name it Custom Field (naming wasnโt an issue here ๐ฅฒ). - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
I found json api spec[1] recently. This kind of is better standard for REST APIs. It is bit rough to handle client side but once you get the hang of it, it is breeze to use [1] https://jsonapi.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
That's it! Now we have a complete set of RESTful CRUD APIs at "/api/zen" that conforms to the JSON:API specification, and the access policies fully protect the APIs. The API provides rich filtering and relation-fetching capabilities. The following are some examples; you can find more details here. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Does this have any relation to https://jsonapi.org/ ? - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Basic REST and JSON RPC are very simple to start with, but have common problems when application gets bigger. How do you represent relations, pagination, filtering etc? My go-to specification for structuring JSON documents is https://jsonapi.org/ It covers most basic needs of a standard API. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Easy, isn't it? The automatically generated APIs provide resource-centric RESTful endpoints using JSON:API as the transportation format. Here're a few more advanced examples of using the API:. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Hahaha, yeah kinda. I initially built QueryR to align with the Json API spec. Source: over 3 years ago
I did for one project, although I got kicked off a year in, because they didn't know what they had. IMHO every REST API should be discoverable this way like the web, for example with links to related resources in responses (at least in dev) and by having OpenAPI documentation at a root path like / or /api. JSON API provides much of this for free when used with something like Laravel: https://jsonapi.org... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Take a look at the JSON:API specification https://jsonapi.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Not sure it's an answer for your question. For simple api, I tend to organize something slightly based on json-api. I just add a success field to ease and open the door for discriminated unions. An example of responses would be in the lines of:. Source: almost 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing JsonAPI to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is JsonAPI good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss JsonAPI here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.