Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Mustache.js VS Jekyll

Compare Mustache.js VS Jekyll and see what are their differences

Zarla
Zarla: The AI Website Builder for Local Businesses featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Mustache.js logo Mustache.js

Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

Jekyll logo Jekyll

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
  • Mustache.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22
  • Jekyll Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-17

Mustache.js features and specs

  • Logic-less Templates
    Mustache.js enforces a logic-less approach to templating, which helps in maintaining separation of concerns by ensuring that templates only concern themselves with presentation and not business logic.
  • Cross-platform Support
    Mustache.js is a JavaScript implementation of the Mustache templating language, which is supported across multiple platforms and languages, making it highly versatile and easy to integrate with various projects.
  • Lightweight
    Mustache.js is a lightweight library with a small footprint, which leads to faster loading times and reduced performance overhead compared to heavier templating engines.
  • Easy to Learn
    The syntax of Mustache is minimalistic and resembles regular HTML, making it easy to learn and adopt, especially for developers familiar with HTML.
  • Prevents Complexity
    By being logic-less, Mustache.js discourages embedding complex logic in templates, which can lead to cleaner and more maintainable codebases.

Possible disadvantages of Mustache.js

  • Limited Logic Handling
    While the logic-less nature of Mustache.js encourages separation of concerns, it can be limiting for developers who need to embed complex logic in their templates, requiring workarounds or supplementary handling in JavaScript.
  • Performance Issues with Large Data
    Mustache.js may encounter performance bottlenecks when rendering large data sets, as the library processes templates and data at runtime.
  • No Built-in Helpers
    Unlike some other templating engines, Mustache.js does not support helpers or custom logic extensions, which can make common tasks cumbersome or require additional code.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Mustache.js lacks some advanced features found in other templating engines, such as conditionals and loops within templates, which can limit its functionality for complex applications.
  • Dependency on External Logic
    Because Mustache.js relies heavily on external data processing, it may lead to scattered business logic across the application that might be difficult to manage as the project grows.

Jekyll features and specs

  • Speed and Performance
    Jekyll generates static websites, which means they load faster compared to dynamic websites. No database queries are required, reducing server overhead and improving performance.
  • Security
    Static sites have a smaller attack surface compared to dynamic sites because they don't rely on databases or server-side code. This means fewer vectors for potential compromises.
  • Simplicity
    Jekyll setups are relatively straightforward, especially if you are comfortable writing in Markdown and HTML. This can make it easier to manage and maintain your website.
  • Integration with GitHub Pages
    Jekyll is designed to work seamlessly with GitHub Pages, allowing you to host your website for free with automatic deployment directly from your GitHub repository.
  • Customizability
    Jekyll allows for extensive customization through its support for plugins, themes, and templates. This can be helpful to create a unique look and functionality for your website.

Possible disadvantages of Jekyll

  • Learning Curve
    While Jekyll is simpler than some other static site generators, it does require some familiarity with the command line, version control (Git), and YAML configuration.
  • Build Time
    For large websites, the build times can become lengthy, which can slow down the development process, especially if you are making frequent updates.
  • Lack of Real-time Content Updates
    Since Jekyll generates static sites, real-time content updates (e.g., comments, dynamic forms) aren't natively supported and require third-party services or additional tooling.
  • Dependence on Ruby
    Jekyll is built with Ruby, so you will need to have Ruby installed and occasionally deal with Ruby-specific issues. This might be a drawback for developers who are not familiar with the Ruby ecosystem.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While Jekyll is very flexible, it doesn’t have built-in support for many features out of the box, which might require you to manually implement or rely on plugins.

Analysis of Jekyll

Overall verdict

  • Jekyll is a good choice for individuals and organizations looking for a straightforward, reliable, and efficient way to build static websites. Its strengths include simplicity, flexibility, and strong community support, which contribute to a smooth development experience.

Why this product is good

  • Jekyll is a popular static site generator that is widely appreciated for its simplicity, speed, and ease of use. It is particularly suited for creating blogs and simple websites, leveraging Markdown and Liquid templates to generate static HTML content. Its integration with GitHub Pages also makes it a convenient choice for developers and non-developers alike who want to host their sites directly from their GitHub repositories without additional setup or cost.

Recommended for

  • Bloggers and content creators looking for a simple way to publish content online.
  • Developers who prefer writing in Markdown and managing content with a version control system.
  • Users who want to host their sites for free using GitHub Pages.
  • Anyone in need of a static site generator that is easy to set up, customize, and maintain with minimal resources.

Mustache.js videos

+ Add

Getting started with Mustache.js

More videos:

  • Tutorial - JavaScript and JSON tutorial: JavaScript templating with mustache.js | lynda.com

Jekyll videos

+ Add

Getting Started With Jekyll, The Static Site Generator

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mustache.js and Jekyll)

Mustache.js

Jekyll

Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0
CMS
0 0%
CMS
100% 100
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
Blogging
0 0%
Blogging
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Mustache.js and Jekyll. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Mustache.js and Jekyll

Mustache.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Mustache.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Jekyll Reviews

Best Gitbook Alternatives You Need to Try in 2023
Jekyll is a static site generator often used to create blogs and websites, similar to Gitbook in its ability to generate documentation from markdown files. Jekyll is built in Ruby and is known for its flexibility and ease of use. It also has a large community and a wide variety of plugins and themes available. Jekyll's main advantage is that it is highly customizable,...
Source: www.archbee.com
11 Popular Free And Open Source WordPress CMS alternatives in 2021
Unlike some listed alternatives, Jekyll is also a static site generator so it lays in the same category. It uses Ruby and we would say it's simpler, free, and open-source CMS software.
Source: medevel.com
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Jekyll isn’t strict with its content location. It expects pages in the root of your site, and will build whatever’s there. Here’s how you might organize these pages in your Jekyll site root:
Source: www.freecodecamp.org
9 Reasons I Think Craft is the Best CMS on the Market Today
Craft CMS is simple, minimalistic, agile and has every capability a modern CMS framework needs. Over the past ten years we have worked with every CMS you could think of (Wordpress, Drupal, Rails+ActiveAdmin, Ghost, Weebly, DjangoCMS, Jekyll, Joomla, Tumblr, Squarespace, Expression Engine, Statamic, Blogger)… here are the reasons why we’ve landed firmly with Craft as our №1...
Source: hackernoon.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jekyll seems to be a lot more popular than Mustache.js. While we know about 195 links to Jekyll, we've tracked only 12 mentions of Mustache.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mustache.js mentions (12)

  • Documenting my pin collection with Segment Anything: Part 3
    Mustache.js: This is a templating engine used for rendering templates on the web. In your application, Mustache.js is used to dynamically create HTML forms based on the data received from the server, such as image cutouts and identifiers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • NakedJSX - Use JSX without React
    JSX just a templating language in this case, right? No reactivity at all? What's the benefit against using something like https://github.com/janl/mustache.js/ ? Source: about 2 years ago
  • Im not sure if im asking the right question here, but how do you create separate pages on a website?
    Nonetheless, I made ridiculous simple MRE(minimal reproducible example) for you: Https://codesandbox.io/s/distracted-gauss-gqfiue You might quickly realize the annoyance of html as strings, move to some template then, e.g: https://handlebarsjs.com/guide/ Also this example uses a library for the routing matching. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Managing application cache with react-query, and code generation.
    Mustache.js is a template engine for creating js templates. Cosmiconfig is a tool to make it convenient to work with the configuration. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • After an eternity, java.com has updated its homepage
    For a small page like that, they are using Oracle content management, knockoutjs, RedwoodJs, MarkedJs, MustacheJs, JQuery and Bootstrap. There's like 10+ layers or div, header and nav elements just to display the logo. They can't even properly anchor the footer at the bottom... Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Jekyll mentions (195)

  • Building PicoSSG: 'Just Enough Code'
    The static site generator (SSG) landscape is crowded with feature-rich but increasingly complex solutions. As I looked at and used tools like lume, 11ty, lektor, or jekyll, I found myself drowning in configuration options, plugins, and middleware. What started as a simple desire to convert Markdown content into HTML had evolved into learning complex frameworks with steep learning curves. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How to create a blog with Quartz, GitHub, and Cloudflare
    If you don't want to use Jekyll as your static site generator for GitHub Pages and you want to have a custom domain for your GitHub Pages. This post is for you! - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Blogging with Obsidian and Jekyll
    Jekyll is a static site generator that transforms Markdown files into a fully functional website. Everything is generated into plain HTML, which makes it simple to deploy on platforms like GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Create a Blogging Platform With No Backend (Zero Hosting Fee)
    Obviously, there are a dozen choices for generating static websites (efficiently and quickly), from the classic Jekyll to the new Next.js. And you are good to go with any of them as long as your confident with it. I choose 11ty because:. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • It's easy to dev blog
    In your repository settings you need to turn on GitHub Pages to make it pull Jekyll content (that's the magic✨ default GitHub Pages build tool) from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mustache.js and Jekyll, you can also consider the following products

EJS - An open source JavaScript Template library.

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

Vash - Vash is a template engine that offers a swift flow between code and content using Razor Syntax

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

FLAVE - Flave was created to bring ASP.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

Loading...