Mustache.js VS BetterCloud

JSX just a templating language in this case, right? No reactivity at all? What's the benefit against using something like https://github.com/janl/mustache.js/ ? Source: 12 months ago

Nonetheless, I made ridiculous simple MRE(minimal reproducible example) for you: Https://codesandbox.io/s/distracted-gauss-gqfiue You might quickly realize the annoyance of html as strings, move to some template then, e.g: https://handlebarsjs.com/guide/ Also this example uses a library for the routing matching. Source: over 1 year ago

Mustache.js is a template engine for creating js templates. Cosmiconfig is a tool to make it convenient to work with the configuration. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

For a small page like that, they are using Oracle content management, knockoutjs, RedwoodJs, MarkedJs, MustacheJs, JQuery and Bootstrap. There's like 10+ layers or div, header and nav elements just to display the logo. They can't even properly anchor the footer at the bottom... Source: almost 2 years ago

Somebody asked about this before, and the only half-baked solution I found was to use Mustache's partials, which doesn't really do the job. Source: about 2 years ago

Also for my last employer, I contributed to their private repo by building a web app that can allow People team to orchestrate IT on/off boarding tasks similar to a tool like (BetterCloud) but built in house. Source: over 1 year ago

It's also called "SaaS management" or "software asset management" e.g. zylo.com bettercloud.com or blissfully.com. Source: over 2 years ago

Many mid-to-large sized organizations use BetterCloud to manage their Google Workspaces. If you use many SaaS products, you can probably manage most of them through their platform. Source: over 2 years ago