Mustache.js VS Apache Velocity

JSX just a templating language in this case, right? No reactivity at all? What's the benefit against using something like https://github.com/janl/mustache.js/ ? Source: 11 months ago

Nonetheless, I made ridiculous simple MRE(minimal reproducible example) for you: Https://codesandbox.io/s/distracted-gauss-gqfiue You might quickly realize the annoyance of html as strings, move to some template then, e.g: https://handlebarsjs.com/guide/ Also this example uses a library for the routing matching. Source: over 1 year ago

Mustache.js is a template engine for creating js templates. Cosmiconfig is a tool to make it convenient to work with the configuration. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

For a small page like that, they are using Oracle content management, knockoutjs, RedwoodJs, MarkedJs, MustacheJs, JQuery and Bootstrap. There's like 10+ layers or div, header and nav elements just to display the logo. They can't even properly anchor the footer at the bottom... Source: almost 2 years ago

Somebody asked about this before, and the only half-baked solution I found was to use Mustache's partials, which doesn't really do the job. Source: about 2 years ago

Create a template that can generate source code (like one of these systems: https://freemarker.sourceforge.io/ http://velocity.apache.org/ https://www.stringtemplate.org/ http://www.telosys.org/). Source: about 3 years ago