Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Move.js VS PixiJS

Compare Move.js VS PixiJS and see what are their differences

Unimus
Unimus is a Network Automation and Configuration management (NCM) solution designed for fast deployment network-wide and ease of use. Unimus does not require learning any abstraction or templating languages, and does not require any coding skills. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Move.js logo Move.js

Move.js is a mini Javascript library that provides CSS3 animations.

PixiJS logo PixiJS

Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.
  • Move.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-15
  • PixiJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25

Move.js features and specs

  • Simple API
    Move.js provides a straightforward and easy-to-use API that allows developers to create animations with minimal code and effort.
  • Lightweight
    The library is small in size, making it ideal for use in projects where performance and load times are critical.
  • CSS3 Support
    Move.js leverages CSS3 transitions, offering smooth and hardware-accelerated animations.
  • Chainable Methods
    The library supports method chaining, enabling developers to write more readable and concise animation sequences.

Possible disadvantages of Move.js

  • Limited Functionality
    Move.js focuses primarily on basic animations, which might not be sufficient for complex animation requirements.
  • Development Inactivity
    The library has not been actively maintained for a while, which may lead to compatibility issues with modern browsers and frameworks.
  • No Built-in Easing Functions
    Move.js relies on CSS transitions for easing functions, offering less flexibility compared to libraries with custom easing options.
  • Dependence on CSS3 Support
    Older browsers that do not fully support CSS3 transitions may not render animations correctly.

PixiJS features and specs

  • Performance
    PixiJS provides high performance through the use of WebGL, offering fast rendering capabilities that can handle complex scenes and animations efficiently.
  • Cross-Platform
    PixiJS is compatible with various platforms, including desktops, tablets, and mobile devices, ensuring a consistent experience across different environments.
  • Rich Features
    It comes with a variety of built-in features such as sprites, filters, masks, and support for different shapes and textures, which makes it powerful for creating interactive graphics.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a user-friendly API and extensive documentation, making it easy to learn and integrate into projects, even for developers who are new to WebGL.
  • Community Support
    PixiJS has an active community and a wealth of resources including forums, tutorials, and GitHub repositories, which help users troubleshoot issues and improve their projects.

Possible disadvantages of PixiJS

  • Size
    PixiJS can be relatively large in terms of file size, which may affect load times and performance, particularly for users with slow internet connections or limited bandwidth.
  • Browser Compatibility
    Since PixiJS relies heavily on WebGL, it may face compatibility issues with older browsers or devices that do not support advanced WebGL features.
  • Complexity
    While powerful, PixiJS can become complex when building more advanced applications, requiring a deep understanding of 3D graphics and WebGL concepts.
  • Limited 3D Support
    PixiJS is primarily a 2D rendering engine and lacks comprehensive support for 3D graphics, which might be a limitation for projects requiring 3D rendering.
  • Memory Management
    Handling memory efficiently can be challenging, especially in complex scenes with many textures and sprites, leading to potential memory leaks or performance degradation.

Move.js videos

No Move.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

PixiJS videos

+ Add

PixiJS Part 3: Renderer, Ticker, & Stage

More videos:

  • Review - Learn PixiJS in 20 Minutes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Move.js and PixiJS)

Move.js

PixiJS

Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
19 19%
Javascript UI Libraries
81% 81
Tool
100 100%
Tool
0% 0
Flowcharts
0 0%
Flowcharts
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Move.js and PixiJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PixiJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 72 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Move.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Move.js yet. Tracking of Move.js recommendations started around Jul 2021.

PixiJS mentions (72)

  • Trying to Replace the DOM with Canvas — And Failing
    To improve performance, another team built a POC replacing standard DOM elements with a canvas managed by a library called pixi.js. The idea was to boost rendering speed. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Building an AI Powered Camera for David Bowie
    We can now decide how we want to display the data.image result back to our user. You can simply throw it up in an tag or generate a reveal video on the fly like I’ve done using Pixi.JS and MediaRecorder. Perhaps a topic for another dev blog. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Tattooing The Black Keys Fans Using MediaDevices and PixiJS
    For this application, we gain access to the user’s camera using MediaDevices and then place it onto a PixiJS canvas as a video sprite. Then, we load the tattoo as an additional sprite and give it a bit of opacity and blending to bleed it into the user’s skin. Simple controls are added to allow the user to rotate, scale, and position the tattoo for the perfect inking. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Chapter 1: Boring SVG Manipulation
    And canvas felt almost natural and invoked heavy nostalgia from the first time I touched keyboard and wrote primitive program to draw a house out of lines utilizing Basic. Later on I had a chance to broaden my expertise, when I was doing my hobby game project with Pixi and small bits and pieces on FindLabs pages. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • JSON Canvas – An open file format for infinite canvas data
    The canvas in Obsidian is as the whole app very well made. I wondered what they are using as well. My guess is https://www.xyflow.com/, which is for drawing nodes. More general purpose would be http://fabricjs.com/. Or very low level https://pixijs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Move.js and PixiJS, you can also consider the following products

Animo.js - Animo.js is a lightweight, open-source tool that enables developers to manipulate animations and transitions.

Three.js - A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.

Magic Animations CSS3 - CSS3 Animations with special effects.

Phaser - Desktop and Mobile HTML5 game framework. A fast, free and fun open source framework for Canvas and WebGL powered browser games.

Stylie - Stylie is an open-source, easy-to-use tool based on Rekapi that allows you to build complex web animations in a short time.

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.

Loading...