Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Animo.js VS Move.js

Compare Animo.js VS Move.js and see what are their differences

Animo.js logo Animo.js

Animo.js is a lightweight, open-source tool that enables developers to manipulate animations and transitions.

Move.js logo Move.js

Move.js is a mini Javascript library that provides CSS3 animations.
Not present
  • Move.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-15

Animo.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Animo.js is a lightweight JavaScript library, which means it doesn't add much overhead to web projects and is quick to load.
  • Ease of Use
    The library provides a simple and intuitive API for creating animations, making it accessible even for beginners.
  • Chainable Animations
    Animo.js supports chaining animations, allowing developers to easily sequence multiple animations for more complex effects.
  • No Dependencies
    It does not require any external libraries like jQuery, making it easy to integrate into projects without additional dependencies.

Possible disadvantages of Animo.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive animation libraries, Animo.js offers a limited set of features, which might not be suitable for all projects.
  • Community and Support
    Being a smaller library, it might not have a large community for support or extensive documentation compared to more popular libraries.
  • Performance
    For very complex animations or high-performance scenarios, native CSS animations or more advanced libraries may be more efficient.
  • Browser Compatibility
    While generally reliable, there might be compatibility issues on older or less commonly used browsers that developers need to test for.

Move.js features and specs

  • Simple API
    Move.js provides a straightforward and easy-to-use API that allows developers to create animations with minimal code and effort.
  • Lightweight
    The library is small in size, making it ideal for use in projects where performance and load times are critical.
  • CSS3 Support
    Move.js leverages CSS3 transitions, offering smooth and hardware-accelerated animations.
  • Chainable Methods
    The library supports method chaining, enabling developers to write more readable and concise animation sequences.

Possible disadvantages of Move.js

  • Limited Functionality
    Move.js focuses primarily on basic animations, which might not be sufficient for complex animation requirements.
  • Development Inactivity
    The library has not been actively maintained for a while, which may lead to compatibility issues with modern browsers and frameworks.
  • No Built-in Easing Functions
    Move.js relies on CSS transitions for easing functions, offering less flexibility compared to libraries with custom easing options.
  • Dependence on CSS3 Support
    Older browsers that do not fully support CSS3 transitions may not render animations correctly.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Animo.js and Move.js)
Development
53 53%
47% 47
Javascript UI Libraries
59 59%
41% 41
Tool
50 50%
50% 50
Charting Libraries
60 60%
40% 40

User comments

Share your experience with using Animo.js and Move.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Animo.js and Move.js, you can also consider the following products

Magic Animations CSS3 - CSS3 Animations with special effects.

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

Stylie - Stylie is an open-source, easy-to-use tool based on Rekapi that allows you to build complex web animations in a short time.

Pixi.js - Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

Ceaser - Ceaser is a handy CSS Easing Animation tool for creating any ease imaginable.

RAWGraphs - RAWGraphs is an open source app built with the goal of making the visualization of complex data...