Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Mockito VS JBehave

Compare Mockito VS JBehave and see what are their differences

Atlas HXM
Atlas HXM is the largest Direct Employer of Record (EOR) technology platform, supported by experts, that delivers flexibility for companies to expand across borders, onboard talent, manage compliance, and pay their global workforce. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Mockito logo Mockito

Mocking framework for unit tests in Java.

JBehave logo JBehave

JBehave is a framework for Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD).
  • Mockito Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-17
  • JBehave Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-15

Mockito features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Mockito provides a clean and simple API that makes it easy to create mock objects and set expectations on them, which reduces the learning curve for new users.
  • Flexible Stubbing
    Allows defining behavior for mock objects, including different outcomes for different inputs, which provides detailed control over the mocked behavior.
  • Enhanced Readability
    The use of clear, human-readable language in test cases helps improve the clarity and maintainability of tests.
  • Integration with JUnit
    Mockito integrates seamlessly with JUnit, a popular testing framework, leveraging annotations and runners for cleaner and more structured test code.
  • Active Community and Support
    Backed by a large and active user community, ensuring constant updates, improvements, and plentiful resources for troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Mockito

  • Limited Deep Mocking
    Mockito can struggle with deep mocking scenarios where you need to mock chained or deeply nested calls, which can add complexity to test setup.
  • Static Method Limitations
    Mockito does not natively support mocking of static methods, requiring additional tools or alternative approaches to handle such cases.
  • Potential Overuse
    Extensive use of mocking might indicate poor design choices, such as tight coupling, and can lead to fragile tests that require significant maintenance.
  • Requires Understanding of Best Practices
    Without understanding or adhering to best practices, developers might misuse Mockito, leading to over-mocking or inappropriate test setups.
  • Advanced Features Require Careful Use
    Advanced features such as answers, spies, or argument captors can increase test complexity and require a deeper understanding to avoid introducing flaky tests.

JBehave features and specs

  • Behavior-Driven Development Support
    JBehave is designed specifically for BDD, helping teams write understandable and executable specifications through structured narratives.
  • Separation of Stories and Code
    It allows for clear separation of stories (requirements) from the actual test code, which helps in maintaining clarity and separation of concerns.
  • Integration with Java Ecosystem
    Being a Java-based tool, JBehave integrates seamlessly with existing Java projects and works well with build tools like Maven and Gradle.
  • Customizable
    JBehave offers customization opportunities, allowing users to adjust the framework to better fit their specific project needs.
  • Community and Documentation
    JBehave is supported by a dedicated community and comprehensive documentation, providing considerable resources for troubleshooting and learning.

Possible disadvantages of JBehave

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For beginners, understanding JBehave's syntax, concepts, and integration can require significant time and effort.
  • Verbose Tests
    The framework can lead to verbose test specifications, which might be cumbersome to manage for large projects with numerous stories.
  • Limited IDE Support
    Compared to other BDD tools like Cucumber, JBehave has limited direct support in IDEs, making it less intuitive for developers used to strong IDE integrations.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Some users might experience compatibility issues when integrating JBehave with certain Java projects or during updates to newer versions of the framework.
  • Resource Intensive
    Executing JBehave tests can be resource-intensive, potentially affecting performance when running large suites of tests.

Mockito videos

+ Add

Mockito JUnit Example

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Mockito Tutorial - Mocking With Junit and Maven
  • Review - Mockito Annotations - @Mock, @Runwith, @InjectMocks and @Captor

JBehave videos

+ Add

BDD automation framework - Jbehave

More videos:

  • Tutorial - JBehave Tutorial 5: View Jbehave Reports
  • Review - Install Natural Eclipse Plugin for Cucumber or JBehave Files

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mockito and JBehave)

Mockito

JBehave

Automated Testing
71 71%
Automated Testing
29% 29
Testing
74 74%
Testing
26% 26
Browser Testing
61 61%
Browser Testing
39% 39
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Mockito and JBehave. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Mockito should be more popular than JBehave. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mockito mentions (17)

  • Effective Strategies for Writing Unit Tests with External Dependencies like Databases and APIs
    For database interactions, tools like Mockito for Java or unittest.mock for Python allow you to create mock objects that return predefined responses or simulate specific behaviors like database query results or error conditions. This is especially useful for testing edge cases without needing to rely on a live database. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Top 10 Java Testing Tools Every Developer Should Know
    Mockito simplifies creating mock objects in unit tests, making it popular for behavior-driven development (BDD) in combination with frameworks like JUnit and TestNG. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Tutorial: Build a Java SDK based on OpenAPI Spec
    Testing is critical to maintaining the reliability of your SDK. For Java, tools Like JUnit and Mockito are Standard for unit testing and mocking. JUnit provides a simple, structured way to write tests, while Mockito allows you To mock objects in tests, which is particularly useful for API-driven SDKs where you need to simulate API responses. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • I build CRUDS as an intern. My boss told me my tests were ok, but too slow, so he modified them to run in a specific order to reuse the app context on all tests. Is that a good practice though?
    I would say no. Mocking is generally creating a mock object. Like with Mockito. https://site.mockito.org. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Instancio 2.2.0 released
    Could you explain how this relates to Mockito? Could it be used together perhaps for more advanced mocking? Source: over 2 years ago
View more

JBehave mentions (2)

  • Week of Java: Part 5: Testing Your Code
    Some BDD frameworks such as JBehave, RSpec, Mocha, Jasmine, Cucumber, among others, embrace the use of this template. Spek is not an exception to this rule. The main difference is that it doesn’t force you to use a concrete assertion framework or additional behavioral files (e.g Cucumber or JBehave). - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • 9 Of The Best Java Testing Frameworks For 2021
    JBehave is also one of the best Java Testing Frameworks, primarily used with Selenium WebDriver for Java testing. JBehave framework is a BDD (Behaviour-Driven Development) framework, which was created in 2003. The ultimate objective behind JBehave is facilitating newcomers to understand and learn about Behaviour-Driven Development at a faster pace. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mockito and JBehave, you can also consider the following products

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

RSpec - RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.

Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.

Loading...