Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Mocha VS Buck

Compare Mocha VS Buck and see what are their differences

Mocha logo Mocha

Sponsors. Use Mocha at Work? Ask your manager or marketing team if they'd help support our project. Your company's logo will also be displayed on npmjs. com and our GitHub repository.

Buck logo Buck

A high-performance build tool for Android by Facebook
  • Mocha Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17
  • Buck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-29

Mocha videos

2018 JORDAN 3 "MOCHA" REVIEW AND ON FEET !!!

More videos:

  • Review - DON'T BUY THE AIR JORDAN 3 MOCHA WITHOUT WATCHING THIS! (In Hand & On Feet Review)
  • Review - Air Jordan 3 'Mocha' 2018 Review

Buck videos

Buck HONEST Operator Review | Rainbow Six Siege

More videos:

  • Review - Unbreakable Pocket Knife Destruction Test - Buck 110 review
  • Review - Buck 110 review after carrying for 9 years

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mocha and Buck)
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Mocha and Buck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Mocha and Buck

Mocha Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Mocha is another leading JavaScript testing framework that runs on Node.js and is widely used for asynchronous testing. It is a feature-rich JavaScript framework, and tests in Mocha run sequentially, with accurate and flexible reports. For JavaScript automated testing, Mocha supports both BDD and TDD environments.

Buck Reviews

We have no reviews of Buck yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buck should be more popular than Mocha. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mocha mentions (3)

  • What’s the most efficient way to get a 3D tracked camera into your Maya scene?
    You may wanna have a look at Mocha Pro or PFTrack, depending on your requirements and your budget. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Anyone know how to get the lock down plug in for free ?
    Don't pirate. If you need mesh tracking, I've had lots of success with Mocha Pro's PowerMesh. There's a free trial, and one month is only $37 USD. Source: over 2 years ago
  • First vfx video. Made my cousin spew laser from his eyes. I still have to learn mocha.
    Mocha is, at it's core, planar tracker, which means it tracks flat surfaces really well, but it's grown to become more of an "object tracker" that can track pretty much anything you want, the Pro version has a PowerMesh function similar to LockDown, powerful rotoscoping tools, and is generally considered to be incredibly useful in VFX. Here's the product page if you want to dive deeper. Pro is free for students... Source: almost 3 years ago

Buck mentions (8)

  • Compiling a single-file app with csc.dll
    We use Buck company wide. Our packaging / deployment system, for example, expects to be given a Buck target to build, not a pre-built binary - I can’t just build my app with dotnet and upload it. While it is possible for a Buck target to be a simple bash command (i.e dotnet publish), doing so makes the target “opaque” - Buck wouldn’t have any knowledge of my app’s build graph so I’d lose many of the benefits it... Source: 12 months ago
  • Just: A Command Runner
    Oh excellent, then better (and more portable!) tools are available: http://pants.build https://ninja-build.org https://buck.build and, if you hate yourself: https://bazel.build. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Dev Discussions: Everything You Need to Know about Monorepos with Juri Strumpflohner of Nrwl
    Pioneered by tech giants like Google and Meta with tools like Bazel and Buck, monorepos are seeing widespread adoption across companies of all sizes and industries. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Using URLs for dependency management
    Buck has a http_file() that you can use this way, and it has first-class support for Java. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is it possible to be an android developer ONLY with the documentation?
    That's a good bridge into saying that we don't use pretty much any standard tooling. Our build system is Buck, we use Mercurial instead of Git, and the IDE of choice seems to be Visual Studio (although Android Studio is supported, with some custom plugins required). Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mocha and Buck, you can also consider the following products

Jasmine - Behavior-Driven JavaScript

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.