Buck
GNU Make
SCons
Ninja Build
Meson
MakeMe
CMake
npm
Jasmine
Mocha
Cypress.io
WebdriverIO
QUnit
Karma
Chai
Mochajs
Buck JasmineBased on our record, Jasmine should be more popular than Buck. It has been mentiond 29 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
We use Buck company wide. Our packaging / deployment system, for example, expects to be given a Buck target to build, not a pre-built binary - I can’t just build my app with dotnet and upload it. While it is possible for a Buck target to be a simple bash command (i.e dotnet publish), doing so makes the target “opaque” - Buck wouldn’t have any knowledge of my app’s build graph so I’d lose many of the benefits it... Source: about 1 year ago
Oh excellent, then better (and more portable!) tools are available: http://pants.build https://ninja-build.org https://buck.build and, if you hate yourself: https://bazel.build. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Pioneered by tech giants like Google and Meta with tools like Bazel and Buck, monorepos are seeing widespread adoption across companies of all sizes and industries. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Buck has a http_file() that you can use this way, and it has first-class support for Java. Source: about 2 years ago
That's a good bridge into saying that we don't use pretty much any standard tooling. Our build system is Buck, we use Mercurial instead of Git, and the IDE of choice seems to be Visual Studio (although Android Studio is supported, with some custom plugins required). Source: about 2 years ago
Jasmine is renowned for its simplicity and is a popular choice for JavaScript testing. Here are its key features:. - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago
Vitest makes it effortless to migrate from Jest. It supports the same Jasmine like API. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
To execute your tests, you can create test scripts using popular testing frameworks like Mocha, Jasmine, or Jest. These frameworks provide a structured way to organize and run your tests, report results, and handle assertions. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
Testing frameworks like Jest, Mocha, and Jasmine are crucial for software development, ensuring code reliability and correctness. They offer features like test suites, test cases, assertions, and asynchronous testing support. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
The test framework used does matter for naming, because in some frameworks you'd use different naming conventions (i.e. The fluent naming used with https://jasmine.github.io/). Source: 12 months ago
GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
Mocha - Sponsors. Use Mocha at Work? Ask your manager or marketing team if they'd help support our project. Your company's logo will also be displayed on npmjs. com and our GitHub repository.
SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.
Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.
WebdriverIO - Webdriver module for Node.js. that makes it easier to write Selenium tests