Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

MobX VS bacon.js

Compare MobX VS bacon.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

MobX logo MobX

Simple, scalable state management

bacon.js logo bacon.js

A small functional reactive programming lib for JavaScript.
  • MobX Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-04-24
  • bacon.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-17

MobX features and specs

  • Simplicity
    MobX allows developers to manage state in a simple and straightforward manner. Its API is minimal and doesn't impose the rigid structure that other state management libraries might require.
  • Reactivity
    The library provides powerful reactive state management, meaning that it automatically updates the UI when the underlying data changes, minimizing boilerplate code.
  • Performance
    MobX optimizes re-rendering by tracking dependencies precisely, making updates efficient and reducing unnecessary renders.
  • Integration
    MobX can easily integrate with React and other JavaScript frameworks, making it flexible for use in various types of projects.

Possible disadvantages of MobX

  • Learning Curve
    While MobX is straightforward for simple use cases, understanding its reactivity and decorators might be challenging for beginners.
  • Scalability Concerns
    For very large applications, the unstructured nature of MobX might lead to spaghetti code if not managed properly, making it harder to maintain.
  • Less Community Support
    Compared to other state management libraries like Redux, MobX has a smaller community, which could mean fewer resources for troubleshooting and learning.
  • Loose Structure
    The lack of rigid structure, while contributing to simplicity, can result in code that is harder to manage, especially in larger applications where a more organized approach might be beneficial.

bacon.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

MobX videos

MobX vs Redux (A MobX Redux comparison)

More videos:

  • Tutorial - MobX tutorial #1 - MobX + React is AWESOME
  • Review - Introduction to MobX & React in 2020
  • Tutorial - MobX in React Tutorial - Scalable State Management
  • Review - Battlefield Developer Tells The Secrets of MobX Nested Stores

bacon.js videos

Bacon.js for Breakfast: An intro to functional reactive programming

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MobX and bacon.js)
Javascript UI Libraries
90 90%
10% 10
Programming Language
0 0%
100% 100
Front-End Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
OOP
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MobX and bacon.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MobX seems to be a lot more popular than bacon.js. While we know about 20 links to MobX, we've tracked only 1 mention of bacon.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MobX mentions (20)

  • Getting started with TiniJS framework
    States can also be organized in some central places (aka. stores). You can use Tini Store (very simple, ~50 lines) or other state management solutions such as MobX, TinyX, ... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Episode 24/13: Native Signals, Details on Angular/Wiz, Alan Agius on the Angular CLI
    Similarly to Promises/A+, this effort focuses on aligning the JavaScript ecosystem. If this alignment is successful, then a standard could emerge, based on that experience. Several framework authors are collaborating here on a common model which could back their reactivity core. The current draft is based on design input from the authors/maintainers of Angular, Bubble, Ember, FAST, MobX, Preact, Qwik, RxJS, Solid,... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • React State Management in 2024
    Mutable-based: leverages proxy to create mutable data sources which can be directly written to or reactively read from. Candidates in this group are MobX and Valtio. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Cami.js – A No Build, Web Component Based Reactive Framework
    Looks good! FWIW I always felt the observable pattern much more intuitive than the redux/reducer style. Something like https://mobx.js.org/ Things get hairy in both, but redux pattern feels so ridiculously ceremonially to effectively manage a huge global state object with a false sense of "purity". Observables otoh say "fuck it, I'm mutating everything, do what you want with it". - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • React Redux
    It's important to note that Redux is just one of many options for global state management in a React application. Other popular options include MobX and the React context API.context API](https://reactjs.org/docs/context.html). - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

bacon.js mentions (1)

  • Static code generation DSL.
    It would be awesome to develop something abstract and useful for usage as common PL (besides just solving specific problem), but it's really hard to develop a general purpose language (with memory management, mutations, etc.). For example, at my work I built reactive library mostly similar to Rx.js or Bacon.js, but with additional ability to compose different reactive systems on top of each other, so that... Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MobX and bacon.js, you can also consider the following products

Redux.js - Predictable state container for JavaScript apps

LIPS Scheme - Scheme based powerful lisp interpreter written in JavaScript

vuex - Centralized State Management for Vue.js

Chicken - A portable and efficient cross-platform Scheme implementation that compiles to C.

Recoiljs - A state management library for React.

Racket Lang - Racket (formerly PLT Scheme) is a modern programming language in the Lisp/Scheme family, suitable...