Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

mmm.page VS Static.app

Compare mmm.page VS Static.app and see what are their differences

mmm.page logo mmm.page

Dead simple, drag & drop personal websites

Static.app logo Static.app

Static.app is the easiest way to host a static HTML website online.
  • mmm.page Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-13
  • Static.app Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-13

mmm.page videos

No mmm.page videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Static.app videos

How to Host your Static Website? Hosting Review - Static.app

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to mmm.page and Static.app)
Website Builder
87 87%
13% 13
Web App
69 69%
31% 31
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using mmm.page and Static.app. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mmm.page should be more popular than Static.app. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

mmm.page mentions (23)

  • Let's make the indie web easier
    You could take a look at this: http://mmm.page/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: What are some well-designed websites?
    Modern at first sight, but quickly dull the senses. Passable for their supreme usability (the Vercel dashboard works better on mobile than many websites on desktop). On the bottom right corners are the grandiloquent, the pompous, the extravagant. See them on Awwwards. Somehow, I feel a sizeable of Web3 websites fall into this, though I have only superficial exposure to them, with their overuse of transitions and... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • The internet has become soulless and I hate it
    Just have a look at Mmm [1] or Kinopio [2] to brighten up your mood. Gopher and FTP servers were fairly soulless as well, so I guess this is just a bit of a nostalgic perspective issue. Just ignore the large websites, as you would ignore tabloids or commercial television. It is actually quite easy to learn that if something is massively popular, it will probably be so because of competitive marketing tricks, and... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • The theory versus the practice of “static websites”
    I always enjoy seeing site creation tools that encourage freeform styling, especially if they it easier than rolling your own HTML/CSS. For example: https://build.mmm.page/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Tiny Awards for Small Websites
    Thanks for the feature. We made the website with https://build.mmm.page/. It is the most fun wysiwyg builder I have used. Highly recommend it, bugs included. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
View more

Static.app mentions (3)

  • Show HN: Statichost.eu – privacy-first static site hosting
    Why is better than for example https://static.app/ or netlify? - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Nomie6 OSS - now available on Github
    Correct, static.app just delivers the HTML, all data is still stored in your browser only. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Nomie6 OSS - now available on Github
    Check out https://static.app - it lets you create a new site and drop the zip in. Just did a test and it seems to work. Source: over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing mmm.page and Static.app, you can also consider the following products

Carrd - Simple, responsive one-page site creator.

GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

Dorik - Build beautiful websites without code!

Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket

Jemi - Sell custom experiences to your audience 💰

Hosting Checker - Find out the hosting provider of any website