mkws(1) VS MiddleMan

I also jokingly refer to https://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/Provider/ShellScript.html as the first version of my static site generator https://mkws.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 days ago

You might enjoy mine https://mkws.sh/. It's shell based. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

I prefer my own UNIX web dev solution https://mkws.sh! Man pages ar too much imo. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

May I recommend my personal creation https://mkws.sh/? Simple, sh based, very customizable, very lightweight. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Been doing this with `mkws` and on https://mkws.sh since day one! - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Most of the Static Site Generators default to generating blog from markdown, which is not feasible for company websites etc. For such projects I like Middleman (https://middlemanapp.com) which provides layouts/partials and things like haml templates. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

I've done similar with Middleman, and I'm 99% sure you could set this up with Pelican if you wanted. It sounds like the site generation workflow is the issue rather than the tool. Source: 11 months ago

I use middleman[^1] + bulmaCSS + FontAwesome but host on github using the `github.io` domain and upload podcasts to "archive.org"[^2]. The reason I choose this setup is because I want the content to survive as much as possible, hence open source technology and "free & long lived" hosting were requirements. [^1]: https://middlemanapp.com/ [^2]: https://archive.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Thanks u/Draegan88, but what's Middleman got to do with app architecture & design/ERD/schema design? Source: over 1 year ago

A simple middleman app consumes the data and builds a static export that runs standalone (just HTML, CSS and some JS files). That gets FTP'd/released to the webserver. Source: about 2 years ago